This is truly a milestone day for democracy in the Philippines. For too long
have the powerful people and big companies pushed the people into sub standards
to feed their greed.
Whether RP Energy wants to waste more resources
on a dead deal or not the system has worked to halt flagrant disrespect for the
will of the people.
9:54 pm | Thursday, February 7th, 2013
SUBIC BAY FREEPORT—The Court of Appeals
(CA) has invalidated the lease development agreement and the environmental
compliance certificate (ECC) of a consortium of energy firms proposing to put up
a coal-fired power plant inside this free port.
Terry Ridon, Kabataan party-list president
and lawyer of stakeholders in the Subic Bay Freeport who filed a writ of
kalikasan in the CA, said the appellate court, in a Jan. 30 decision, nullified
the lease development contract and ECC of the 600-megawatt coal-fired power
plant of the Redondo Peninsula Energy Inc. (RP Energy) that would be built here.
Ridon, in a telephone interview on
Thursday, said RP Energy has “no legal leg to stand on to proceed with the
construction.”
Asked on what grounds the project was
stopped by the CA, he said: “Everything [was] nullified because of no [local
government] approval, no NCIP (National Commission on Indigenous Peoples]
certification and violation of ECC restrictions.”
Ridon, however, said the CA did not issue
a temporary environmental protection order (Tepo) because the power plant has
yet to operate.
“The [Tepo] was not issued because the CA
said the project was not operational yet so there’s no environmental damage
yet,” he said.
The Inquirer had yet to receive a copy of
the CA’s 101-page decision on Thursday. Ridon, however, read the highlights of
the decision during a telephone interview on Thursday.
Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA)
Chair Roberto Garcia said he has yet to receive a copy of the decision.
RP Energy signed a lease development
agreement with the SBMA on June 28, 2010, for $3.8 per square meter for 38
hectares within 50 years.
In December 2008, former Environment
Secretary Jose Atienza issued an ECC for 300-MW of the power plant project. On
Nov. 15, 2012, Environment Secretary Ramon Paje released an amended ECC for 600
MW.
On July 31 last year, the Supreme Court
issued a writ of kalikasan against the project. Through the writ, the high court
ordered the SBMA, the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, and RP
Energy to answer concerns raised by groups opposing the project.
The high court did not issue a Tepo and
ordered the CA to hold hearings for a final decision.
Ridon, however, said RP Energy and all
parties can appeal the decision.
“But they have to start all over again.
They have to stop construction in the area, or they will be violating Philippine
laws. They cannot proceed without an ECC,” he said.
“RP Energy would have a hard time
convincing banks to finance the project because of the costly delays. They might
just pass this on to consumers, so the promise of cheap electricity is gone,” he
said.
Gregorio Magdaraog, head of the Subic Bay
Freeport Chamber for Health and Environment Conservation (SBF-CHEC), has asked
the SBMA to enforce the court’s decision.
“[The SBMA should] revoke all permits and
stop site preparations. RP Energy can no longer be allowed to damage Redondo
Peninsula any further,” Magdaraog said.
“Subic stakeholders applaud the CA
decision,” he said.