The Hanjin Bus Crash

Reader comments on "More Hanjin Employee's Die":

Both the inquirer and gmanews.tv got it wrong. Gmanews.tv reporter John Bayarong and Philippine daily Inquirer's Tonnette Orejeas and Robert Gonzaga should do a better job next time.

That's was not a Hanjin bus. It was a ZAMODCA bus commissioned by Hanjin to ferry their passenger.

Second, they were not speeding as you described it. The first jeepney slammed the brakes to avoid a pedestrian making tough for the mini-bus to avoid the jeepney.

Because of the impact, it sent the jeepney slamming into the other one.

But yes, Hanjin should look into its contracts with WPH and ZAMODCA.

AND its nice to hear for once the subic bulletin calling things about Gordon the right way. There used to be just silence.

Maybe you are really politically neutral after all.

[The Subic Bulletin] Thanks for the corrections. But blaming the jeep for slamming on its bakes may be bending the rules a little. Road rules around the world state you have to leave sufficient distance to stop in an emergency the bus driver must be held responsible, but we get your point.

and another;

More blatant bias by the Zoobic Bulletin in another folly against a Korean investor.

If you are going to use Hanjin as the title and then add a spiel about PUBLIC officials, then why not title it "Recent road accidents in Subic".

I am surprised that they don't offer more news on car accidents seeing how Filippinos CANNOT drive and that having Jeepneys always causes issues on the roads whether here in Subic or in Manila. Jeepneys are a major liability to this great nation.

[The Subic Bulletin] The story was reported by all the media as a Hanjin related event we added in the other story to soften the focus on Hanjin but we can keep the focus only on Hanjin in future if you prefer?