Comment from a reader on "Access To The Mall":
Did I hear right? investment and redevelopment? If there's no profit in it, somehow I doubt we'll see these changes in our lifetime.
Aim High Olongapo (meaning high from the poisonous fumes of the river). I have 4 suggestions:
1. For Xmas we buy all members of THE administration books on "corporate responsibility", "basic human rights" and "how to run a town for dummies 101"
2. We set up rats and cockroaches with their own businesses. The income generated will be able to pay rent for newly refurbished sewers and a clean waterway.
3. Start transferring people's hard earned taxes, rents, bogus collected charges into local community projects rather than paying salaries to people that can't seem to do their job yet know how to spend public funds with ease.
4. For every 10 members of administration we could employ one of the many monkeys and stray dogs roaming the streets because I'm sure they'll do a much better job of it.
Hold the press!!! news has it that ad congress may be hosted by SBFZ, that means income, that means a makeover, that means happy happy joy joy. It's a shame the makeover will only last for 6months though - sigh!!
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Friday, October 30, 2009
The Hanjin Bully
Comment from a reader on "What Is A Life Worth":
Same as the Korean foreman who got off lightly after bashing a worker at Hanjin Shipyard. He is still there-was not sent back to Korea. Just had to make a cash payment. Is this a new system-pay for license to assault or kill-stay out of the courts.
and another;
Is there any information regarding the settlement of the case involving the Korean Lee who bashed the Filipino worker at hanjin? And what if any discipline was taken vs Lee? I believe the court case was dropped.
Presumably he was not deported as threatened, and therefore still working at the shipyard?
I would be interested in doing a follow-up but it is hard to get any info here re the SBMA and Hanjin, and the main media seems to have dropped the story, as they do!
[The Subic Bulletin] Information provided to The Subic Bulletin was that the matter was paid off for 35,000 pesos and all was forgotten. No doubt this bully will do it again.
Same as the Korean foreman who got off lightly after bashing a worker at Hanjin Shipyard. He is still there-was not sent back to Korea. Just had to make a cash payment. Is this a new system-pay for license to assault or kill-stay out of the courts.
and another;
Is there any information regarding the settlement of the case involving the Korean Lee who bashed the Filipino worker at hanjin? And what if any discipline was taken vs Lee? I believe the court case was dropped.
Presumably he was not deported as threatened, and therefore still working at the shipyard?
I would be interested in doing a follow-up but it is hard to get any info here re the SBMA and Hanjin, and the main media seems to have dropped the story, as they do!
[The Subic Bulletin] Information provided to The Subic Bulletin was that the matter was paid off for 35,000 pesos and all was forgotten. No doubt this bully will do it again.
Good For You
Comment from a reader on "No More Investment":
Good for you.
Bring your money somewhere else.
It will not be missed.
Good for you.
Bring your money somewhere else.
It will not be missed.
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Travelling over the All Saints' Weekend
From the Sun Star Pampanga:
BASES Conversion and Development Authority (BCDA) directed the Joint Venture of the 93.7-kilometer toll road interim service provider to start gearing up for the traditional All Saints' Day exodus.
Learning from past years' experience about unusually long vehicle queues in three SCTEX interchanges -- Mabalacat, Clark, and Subic, the BCDA officials advised Tollways Management Corp. (TMC) to draw up additional measures to make travel at the Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressway (SCTEX) during the holiday "more comfortable and enjoyable this time around."
"We can very well handle the expected upsurge of vehicles on All Saints' Day and All Souls' Day (November 1-2) more effectively given the emergency measures in our disposal at any given time," TMC official Charlie Española said.
Anticipating huge traffic volumes arising from the yearly "Undas" observance when people pay their respects to departed loved ones, Española said TMC field personnel would be beefed up to help ensure smoother flow of traffic.
"We are taking a pro-active stance to make sure that movement of vehicles at the usual choke points remains manageable," Española said.
The contingency measures include rerouting of traffic in the Mabalacat Concepcion-Clark area during peak hours, and deployment of additional hand-held ticket readers to assist the booth tellers in toll fee collection.
More temporary entry or exit lanes would be made available as the need arises, Española said.
He pointed out, however, that the motorists themselves can contribute to averting traffic jams at the interchanges by preparing the exact amount for toll fees, saying the process of breaking large bills into smaller amounts lengthens the motorists' stay at the toll plazas.
But more important is to avoid traveling during the rush hours when the gridlocks normally occur, the TMC official said.
He pointed out that the queues at the toll plazas usually get longer from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. at the entry lanes and from 3 p.m. to 6 p.m. at the exit lanes.
"For your own convenience, try to avoid these particular hours," Española advised motorists.
He said the travelers might also find it handy to bring along a road map, or study their routes before embarking on their trip.
"Getting lost along the way certainly takes the fun out of traveling," he said.Road Trains In Subic - A Very Bad Idea
Comment from a reader on Road Trains:
You see SBMA is suggesting put road trains on the SCTEX?
What the f...? The SCTEX, which is a short, modern highway, has already been the site of horrific fatal accidents due to poor regulation and excessive speeding. Now they want to put these colossal, difficult to manage road trains on the highway?
Overloaded, smoke belching trucks already clog the Tipo highway. Even in highly regulated countries such as Australia, road trains are considered too dangerous to use in anything but remote areas. And road trains aren't appropriate for short distances. In a country where truck drivers where flip flop sandals, road trains should not be introduced.
[The Subic Bulletin] We also are astonished by this announcement. We have long been saying that the Tipo Road is one of the most dangerous roads in The Philippines. Some weekends there are two or three accidents and there is about 1 runaway truck "jackknife" every week.
Even if the SCTEX was suitable for road trains TIPO IS NOT!
You see SBMA is suggesting put road trains on the SCTEX?
What the f...? The SCTEX, which is a short, modern highway, has already been the site of horrific fatal accidents due to poor regulation and excessive speeding. Now they want to put these colossal, difficult to manage road trains on the highway?
Overloaded, smoke belching trucks already clog the Tipo highway. Even in highly regulated countries such as Australia, road trains are considered too dangerous to use in anything but remote areas. And road trains aren't appropriate for short distances. In a country where truck drivers where flip flop sandals, road trains should not be introduced.
[The Subic Bulletin] We also are astonished by this announcement. We have long been saying that the Tipo Road is one of the most dangerous roads in The Philippines. Some weekends there are two or three accidents and there is about 1 runaway truck "jackknife" every week.
Even if the SCTEX was suitable for road trains TIPO IS NOT!
The Baloy Tollway
Comment from a reader on "Failed Democracy or Voter Ignorance":
you don't have to pay the fee if you are patronizing one of the establishments.
I understand they all pay a fee to Carlito (scumbag) Baloy to utilize his access road.
you don't have to pay the fee if you are patronizing one of the establishments.
I understand they all pay a fee to Carlito (scumbag) Baloy to utilize his access road.
Wednesday, October 28, 2009
The RK Hotel
Comment from a reader on the RK Hotel:
Below is something I just saw, don't know if it is true or not but would not surprise me. Seems Subic will become a little Korea in the not so distance future!!
Just this week Mr Hanjin's friend, Mr[name removed] sent out emails to all tourist related business in the subic area informing one and all that the RK Hotel is Exclusive for Korean Guests
Only, and in fact NO LOCAL or Foreign guests will be accommodated.
[The Subic Bulletin] Its taken us some time to print this comment because we wanted to check it out fully. While we appreciate you advising us of this rumor but we can confirm that it is nonsense!
The Subic Bulletin has investigated this fully, even to the extent of asking visiting Filipino and European friends to book in and stay at the RK Hotel. They were not only accepted, but treated very well.
If any hotel in Subic was acting in a racist manor we would be all over them right here in the Bulletin and on the other side of the coin we want to dispel any rumors of this nature that are not true.
We removed the owners name from your comment because it seems he has done nothing wrong apart from his gaudy choice of color schemes, but that is another story...
Below is something I just saw, don't know if it is true or not but would not surprise me. Seems Subic will become a little Korea in the not so distance future!!
Just this week Mr Hanjin's friend, Mr
Only, and in fact NO LOCAL or Foreign guests will be accommodated.
[The Subic Bulletin] Its taken us some time to print this comment because we wanted to check it out fully. While we appreciate you advising us of this rumor but we can confirm that it is nonsense!
The Subic Bulletin has investigated this fully, even to the extent of asking visiting Filipino and European friends to book in and stay at the RK Hotel. They were not only accepted, but treated very well.
If any hotel in Subic was acting in a racist manor we would be all over them right here in the Bulletin and on the other side of the coin we want to dispel any rumors of this nature that are not true.
We removed the owners name from your comment because it seems he has done nothing wrong apart from his gaudy choice of color schemes, but that is another story...
The Leashold Rights Fight
Comment from a reader on SBMA's leaseholder rights scam:
I have 2 points I'd like to make regarding the Lease Holder Rights Certificates
1. The proposed fee schedule for the Lease Holder Rights Certificates is based on value (ad valorem tax). An ad Vlorem tax can only be applied to the owner of the property, e.g. SBMA. So if SBMA proposes an Ad Valorem tax, they should tax themselves since they are the owners of the property.
2. Whenever the Government of the Philippines is faced with an natural disaster that through their own incompetance and failure to provide for contingencies, they always call upon to US Government (military) to bail them out, i.e. US Marines in the Bagoiu Earthquakes in the early 90's, US Navy Squadron VC-5 with the only flyable helocopters during Pinatubo, US Airforce F-4 Phantom flying Combat Air Patrols (CAP) in support of the Aquino Administration during the the Coup attempts in the 80's... they always rely on the the US Government and military, not the Australians, not Eurpoeans, not South Koreans... US Military to bail them out.
I know, I was there during all of this. Before the SBMA government attempts to extort money off retired US military residents, they should think about this and realize that we are not Filipinos, and we will not accept this.
If SBMA wants a fight, they should bring a lunch because we will no accept this. We will contact our representatives and our President and we we see what happens the next time the Philippines cannot handle administration of their own country.
I have 2 points I'd like to make regarding the Lease Holder Rights Certificates
1. The proposed fee schedule for the Lease Holder Rights Certificates is based on value (ad valorem tax). An ad Vlorem tax can only be applied to the owner of the property, e.g. SBMA. So if SBMA proposes an Ad Valorem tax, they should tax themselves since they are the owners of the property.
2. Whenever the Government of the Philippines is faced with an natural disaster that through their own incompetance and failure to provide for contingencies, they always call upon to US Government (military) to bail them out, i.e. US Marines in the Bagoiu Earthquakes in the early 90's, US Navy Squadron VC-5 with the only flyable helocopters during Pinatubo, US Airforce F-4 Phantom flying Combat Air Patrols (CAP) in support of the Aquino Administration during the the Coup attempts in the 80's... they always rely on the the US Government and military, not the Australians, not Eurpoeans, not South Koreans... US Military to bail them out.
I know, I was there during all of this. Before the SBMA government attempts to extort money off retired US military residents, they should think about this and realize that we are not Filipinos, and we will not accept this.
If SBMA wants a fight, they should bring a lunch because we will no accept this. We will contact our representatives and our President and we we see what happens the next time the Philippines cannot handle administration of their own country.
Tuesday, October 27, 2009
Americans To Do Hard Labor In Guam
Comment on your post "Guam Military Buildup":
Subic Bulletin. Re: Your last last sentence hoping for Filipino involvement in Guam military construction.
With Stateside unemployment in the double digits in many areas, Guam needs to offer these jobs to other Americans willing to travel to this US territory, before handing them out to the citizens of foreign nations.
[The Subic Bulletin] while some others share your sentiment including grandstanding US politician Neil Abercrombie, we somehow can't help to think that this is highly unlikely unless the plan involves taking a pickup truck down to the local DIY to pick up loads of Mexican illegals, oops, I mean "undocumented Americans".
Fact is western society gives so much to low income earners that the desire to get out and do hard labor dwindles. If the politicians do force the Guam project to be all American labor they can be sure that costs are way up and productivity will be way down while the unions will be urging everyone to strike for better conditions, but its OK the Hawaiians will sleep through it all.
Add to this the Chamorros who say they don't want the base but still have a higher enlistment rate than any other US state or territory, shouldn't they be first in line?
Actually your comment sums it up well "Americans willing to travel to this US territory", OK so we have two workers ready to go!
I do exaggerate a little of course but the sentiment is there, so here's a choice for you, give the jobs to people who are already quite happy spending there time showing that the US social welfare system works, a system designed and implemented by the good old USA so that no one has to worry about feeding their family or give the jobs to those who are so hungry for the jobs that they will head off for years at a time and do anything just so they know their families can eat.
We would like to think that Americans can also be sensible and humanitarian, or are we wrong?
Subic Bulletin. Re: Your last last sentence hoping for Filipino involvement in Guam military construction.
With Stateside unemployment in the double digits in many areas, Guam needs to offer these jobs to other Americans willing to travel to this US territory, before handing them out to the citizens of foreign nations.
[The Subic Bulletin] while some others share your sentiment including grandstanding US politician Neil Abercrombie, we somehow can't help to think that this is highly unlikely unless the plan involves taking a pickup truck down to the local DIY to pick up loads of Mexican illegals, oops, I mean "undocumented Americans".
Fact is western society gives so much to low income earners that the desire to get out and do hard labor dwindles. If the politicians do force the Guam project to be all American labor they can be sure that costs are way up and productivity will be way down while the unions will be urging everyone to strike for better conditions, but its OK the Hawaiians will sleep through it all.
Add to this the Chamorros who say they don't want the base but still have a higher enlistment rate than any other US state or territory, shouldn't they be first in line?
Actually your comment sums it up well "Americans willing to travel to this US territory", OK so we have two workers ready to go!
I do exaggerate a little of course but the sentiment is there, so here's a choice for you, give the jobs to people who are already quite happy spending there time showing that the US social welfare system works, a system designed and implemented by the good old USA so that no one has to worry about feeding their family or give the jobs to those who are so hungry for the jobs that they will head off for years at a time and do anything just so they know their families can eat.
We would like to think that Americans can also be sensible and humanitarian, or are we wrong?
Peal Airways First Flight
Comment from a reader on "Subic Airport's Target Market":
Absolutely right ! The General running the airport and his staff obviously have not got a clue what they are doing.
I definately would not get in that Pacific Pearl 737 even if it was given for free.
The targets should be the low cost carriers such as Cebu Pacific, Tiger and Air Asia.
[The Subic Bulletin] Maybe we could have a big junket flight for Politicians on the first Peal Airways flight, with any luck we could reduce corruption overnight!
Absolutely right ! The General running the airport and his staff obviously have not got a clue what they are doing.
I definately would not get in that Pacific Pearl 737 even if it was given for free.
The targets should be the low cost carriers such as Cebu Pacific, Tiger and Air Asia.
[The Subic Bulletin] Maybe we could have a big junket flight for Politicians on the first Peal Airways flight, with any luck we could reduce corruption overnight!
Monday, October 26, 2009
The Troubles With Clark Airport
Comment from a reader on "Permanent Residency In The Philippines":
I am a 13(a) holder and last departure I paid the following:
PHP 2,170 immigration fees
PHP 750 (everyone has to pay this) Airport departure fee)
PHP 1,620 Travel tax 13 (a) holders have to pay this. It is normally included in the ticket but since the advent of the low cost airlines like Tiger and Cebpac then it is collected at the airport sometimes! My last departure was the first time they actually collected it.
So i paid a total of PHP 4540 to leave the country. My round trip ticket to KK only cost PHP3,000
This travel tax was imposed during the Marcos days and was equivalent to USD 100 at that time. It was designed to encourage Filipinos not to go overseas for vacations but to spend their money here thus keeping the foreign currency in the country.
Its relevance now is questionable. Most of the money actually goes to the department of tourism.
Another issue with me is the collection of the immigration fees of PHP2,170. I showed up in very good time but as 2 flights were departing at the same time from Clark there were only 2 immigration officers on duty working inefficiently.
The flight was delayed because of the inept bureau of immigration officers. There are now about 6 counters but only 2 manned. So i paid the fee and the guy put it straight in his pocket. No time for a receipt sir or you will miss your flight.
Now the receipt is not so important to me but I pay a huge amount in taxes every year that pays these guys salaries. I might add that this is a fairly common occurrence at Clark. Always the same individuals. I guess most people feel the same as I do that if we do anything about this rampant corruption they will give us more problems in the future.
By the way as far as I am aware certain types of SRRV holders are allowed to work but there is a cap on the income.
[The Subic Bulletin] Firstly lets deal with Clark Airport (DIMA), the management of this airport has been a big disappointment.
Immigration:
The immigration office is headed up by the Governor's nephew, that's surely why your immigration fees went into the pocket, but moreover they haven't even bothered to buy a i-card reader so after investing all the government money in an i-card system, it is still done manually at an airport which is specifically mandated to attract that profile of passenger. This is also why there is NO arrival express lane for residents carrying an i-card. Every time you try to depart there you have to wait while they go and find immigration staff to assist you, I mean where are they if they are not attending to their duties when there is aircraft departing soon.
Travel Tax Collection:
Although technically you can collect travel tax on every departure the system has long been to only collect travel tax from permanent residents that has been 12 months since their last entry. They do not collect travel tax from regular permanent resident travelers through Manila Airport but recently Clark airport became militant on the issue and even started getting security to use stand-over tactics on permanent residents who were being demanded to pay a tax that had never been asked from them before. Simple answer is that it now costs more to exit Clark than Manila, well done Clark tourism marketing!
Baggage Handling:
Clark would have to have the slowest baggage handling in the Philippines, with one plane on the tarmac you must ask if they are inspecting every item one by one as they take it off the plane because its easily 20 mins just to get your bags 100 meters from the plane. Maybe its a lack of equipment but its still a dismal effort.
Customs:
On frequent arrivals into Clark the customs officials demanded to open EVERY BAG OF EVERY PASSENGER and of course they did this with only TWO customs officers. In hundreds of entries to Manila we have never witnessed this. On one occasion I suggested that this seemed like a bad idea given there was already a line of 80 people waiting and the customs officer went off his brain screaming at me "Don't you think I know my job" and "Your just a visitor here you better watch yourself" then he turned to his boss and screamed "this man thinks we are stupid, what do you want to do with him", fearing I was about to get a body cavity inspection I didn't try to reason with them that it was a helpful observation but it was clear their attitude was not at all welcoming to tourists.
Now in regard to the Philippine Retirement Authorities SRRV visa and the ability to work.
Our statement on SRRV visa holders not being able to work was based on a presentation by the Philippine Retirement Authority that we attended. During the question and answer section a member of the audience asked "If I have an SRRV can I get a work permit" the then head of the Philippine Retirement Authority said "Of course not, your here to retire not work". We notice that this advice does not match what it says on the PRA website.
See this link: http://www.pra.gov.ph/main/faq?page=1#req3
Either this regulation has changed or the PRA didn't really know their product. What else is new...
I am a 13(a) holder and last departure I paid the following:
PHP 2,170 immigration fees
PHP 750 (everyone has to pay this) Airport departure fee)
PHP 1,620 Travel tax 13 (a) holders have to pay this. It is normally included in the ticket but since the advent of the low cost airlines like Tiger and Cebpac then it is collected at the airport sometimes! My last departure was the first time they actually collected it.
So i paid a total of PHP 4540 to leave the country. My round trip ticket to KK only cost PHP3,000
This travel tax was imposed during the Marcos days and was equivalent to USD 100 at that time. It was designed to encourage Filipinos not to go overseas for vacations but to spend their money here thus keeping the foreign currency in the country.
Its relevance now is questionable. Most of the money actually goes to the department of tourism.
Another issue with me is the collection of the immigration fees of PHP2,170. I showed up in very good time but as 2 flights were departing at the same time from Clark there were only 2 immigration officers on duty working inefficiently.
The flight was delayed because of the inept bureau of immigration officers. There are now about 6 counters but only 2 manned. So i paid the fee and the guy put it straight in his pocket. No time for a receipt sir or you will miss your flight.
Now the receipt is not so important to me but I pay a huge amount in taxes every year that pays these guys salaries. I might add that this is a fairly common occurrence at Clark. Always the same individuals. I guess most people feel the same as I do that if we do anything about this rampant corruption they will give us more problems in the future.
By the way as far as I am aware certain types of SRRV holders are allowed to work but there is a cap on the income.
[The Subic Bulletin] Firstly lets deal with Clark Airport (DIMA), the management of this airport has been a big disappointment.
Immigration:
The immigration office is headed up by the Governor's nephew, that's surely why your immigration fees went into the pocket, but moreover they haven't even bothered to buy a i-card reader so after investing all the government money in an i-card system, it is still done manually at an airport which is specifically mandated to attract that profile of passenger. This is also why there is NO arrival express lane for residents carrying an i-card. Every time you try to depart there you have to wait while they go and find immigration staff to assist you, I mean where are they if they are not attending to their duties when there is aircraft departing soon.
Travel Tax Collection:
Although technically you can collect travel tax on every departure the system has long been to only collect travel tax from permanent residents that has been 12 months since their last entry. They do not collect travel tax from regular permanent resident travelers through Manila Airport but recently Clark airport became militant on the issue and even started getting security to use stand-over tactics on permanent residents who were being demanded to pay a tax that had never been asked from them before. Simple answer is that it now costs more to exit Clark than Manila, well done Clark tourism marketing!
Baggage Handling:
Clark would have to have the slowest baggage handling in the Philippines, with one plane on the tarmac you must ask if they are inspecting every item one by one as they take it off the plane because its easily 20 mins just to get your bags 100 meters from the plane. Maybe its a lack of equipment but its still a dismal effort.
Customs:
On frequent arrivals into Clark the customs officials demanded to open EVERY BAG OF EVERY PASSENGER and of course they did this with only TWO customs officers. In hundreds of entries to Manila we have never witnessed this. On one occasion I suggested that this seemed like a bad idea given there was already a line of 80 people waiting and the customs officer went off his brain screaming at me "Don't you think I know my job" and "Your just a visitor here you better watch yourself" then he turned to his boss and screamed "this man thinks we are stupid, what do you want to do with him", fearing I was about to get a body cavity inspection I didn't try to reason with them that it was a helpful observation but it was clear their attitude was not at all welcoming to tourists.
Now in regard to the Philippine Retirement Authorities SRRV visa and the ability to work.
Our statement on SRRV visa holders not being able to work was based on a presentation by the Philippine Retirement Authority that we attended. During the question and answer section a member of the audience asked "If I have an SRRV can I get a work permit" the then head of the Philippine Retirement Authority said "Of course not, your here to retire not work". We notice that this advice does not match what it says on the PRA website.
See this link: http://www.pra.gov.ph/main/faq?page=1#req3
Either this regulation has changed or the PRA didn't really know their product. What else is new...
Barretto Bars In The 70's
Comment from a reader on "The Bars In Barretto":
Excellent response, SB.
I would quibble with the statement"..bars in Barretto since the mid 80's." I remember them at least to the early 70's, although certainly not in the numbers that exist today.
[The Subic Bulletin] We weren't here that far back but we would guess they were a lot wilder than the well behaved (read: highly controlled) establishments of today.
Excellent response, SB.
I would quibble with the statement"..bars in Barretto since the mid 80's." I remember them at least to the early 70's, although certainly not in the numbers that exist today.
[The Subic Bulletin] We weren't here that far back but we would guess they were a lot wilder than the well behaved (read: highly controlled) establishments of today.
Sunday, October 25, 2009
Maybe Not In The USA
Comment from a reader on "Government Provided Consumer Protection":
The Comment "No legal remedy for SBMA Leaseholders" misrepresents the U.S. Supreme Court case of Laidlaw v. Organ. The issue in that case was whether the seller of a product could fail to disclose information in his possession which affected the value, and hence price of the product, when the buyer specifically asked the seller if the seller knew of information which affected the value of the product. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the failure of the seller to disclose, when specifically asked if he had information in his possession affecting the value of the product, was fraudulent conduct on the part of the seller. Organ v. Laidlaw IS authority for the proposition that a seller need not volunteer information in his possession affecting the value of a product, if the buyer does NOT inquire if the seller has any such information. The Poster of the Comment apparently believes that Organ v. Laidlaw stands for the proposition that a buyer cannot rely on a seller's representations, including a seller's failure to disclose knowlege in his possession. Instead, the Poster apparently believes that Organ v. Laidlaw holds that a buyer must independently verify the truth of a seller's representations, including the truth of a state of facts that the seller implies by his nondisclosure. The Posters understanding of Organ v. Laidlaw and caveat emptor is incorrect. Even under principles of caveat emptor, as set forth in Organ v. Laidlaw, SBMA leaseholders are entitled to rely on representations made by SBMA, including the omission of SBMA to set forth the title registry fees and survey fees in their leases with SBMA.
[The Subic Bulletin] While we appreciate your commendatory on US law, we can't see why you believe this to be relevant here. Welcome to the Philippines.
The Comment "No legal remedy for SBMA Leaseholders" misrepresents the U.S. Supreme Court case of Laidlaw v. Organ. The issue in that case was whether the seller of a product could fail to disclose information in his possession which affected the value, and hence price of the product, when the buyer specifically asked the seller if the seller knew of information which affected the value of the product. The U.S. Supreme Court held that the failure of the seller to disclose, when specifically asked if he had information in his possession affecting the value of the product, was fraudulent conduct on the part of the seller. Organ v. Laidlaw IS authority for the proposition that a seller need not volunteer information in his possession affecting the value of a product, if the buyer does NOT inquire if the seller has any such information. The Poster of the Comment apparently believes that Organ v. Laidlaw stands for the proposition that a buyer cannot rely on a seller's representations, including a seller's failure to disclose knowlege in his possession. Instead, the Poster apparently believes that Organ v. Laidlaw holds that a buyer must independently verify the truth of a seller's representations, including the truth of a state of facts that the seller implies by his nondisclosure. The Posters understanding of Organ v. Laidlaw and caveat emptor is incorrect. Even under principles of caveat emptor, as set forth in Organ v. Laidlaw, SBMA leaseholders are entitled to rely on representations made by SBMA, including the omission of SBMA to set forth the title registry fees and survey fees in their leases with SBMA.
[The Subic Bulletin] While we appreciate your commendatory on US law, we can't see why you believe this to be relevant here. Welcome to the Philippines.
Latest Screw-up In Baloy
Comment from a reader on Baloy Beach:
The Baloy beach area seems to get worse and worse and the latest decision is another fine example.
True, there is a decent beach area and a few decent restaurants but with the amount of sewage being released, one would be ill advised to swim in the water. Street vendors are becoming more and more aggressive and those who try to park along the streets are being no-so-subtley advised they need to pay a "fee" to do so. To this is the "check point" which is nothing more than an entrance fee to those who are unsuspecting.
Two or three inches of rain will flood the area and the road from the national highway turnoff is about as bad as any road in Zambales. And now comes the decision to not allow trikes from Barretto into Baloy and not to allow Baloy trikes into Barretto. This means that if you come from Barretto to Baloy, you must get out of one trike (and pay) and get into another trike (and pay) if you want to go to Baloy. Same for the reverse trip. One would think that with all the businesses in the Baloy area that there would be enough influence to get some of these problems fixed. In conversations about this mess, one name keeps coming up time and time again.
Sure doesn't sound like there is any plan to improve the place for the various foreign and local visitors, which is their bread and butter.
The Baloy beach area seems to get worse and worse and the latest decision is another fine example.
True, there is a decent beach area and a few decent restaurants but with the amount of sewage being released, one would be ill advised to swim in the water. Street vendors are becoming more and more aggressive and those who try to park along the streets are being no-so-subtley advised they need to pay a "fee" to do so. To this is the "check point" which is nothing more than an entrance fee to those who are unsuspecting.
Two or three inches of rain will flood the area and the road from the national highway turnoff is about as bad as any road in Zambales. And now comes the decision to not allow trikes from Barretto into Baloy and not to allow Baloy trikes into Barretto. This means that if you come from Barretto to Baloy, you must get out of one trike (and pay) and get into another trike (and pay) if you want to go to Baloy. Same for the reverse trip. One would think that with all the businesses in the Baloy area that there would be enough influence to get some of these problems fixed. In conversations about this mess, one name keeps coming up time and time again.
Sure doesn't sound like there is any plan to improve the place for the various foreign and local visitors, which is their bread and butter.
Saturday, October 24, 2009
SCTEX Is For Motor Vehicles!
Comment on a reader regarding the practice of closing have the SCTEX for sporting event use:
Last Saturday morning I set off for Clark and was absolutely astonished that one side of the SCTEX was closed for a "Bicycle Race".
So we had counterflow on one side only. Not only is this dangerous, it is gross stupidity to close half of a major highway leading to a major tourist destination on a weekend for a "Bicycle Race" Not only that, it was organized by non other than the Department of Tourism!
Needless to say they still collected the full toll fee at the other end.
[The Subic Bulletin] The Subic Bulletin has complained about this issue before, in fact previously when they closed the SCTEX they almost killed motorists by routing traffic head on towards each other http://thesubicbulletin.blogspot.com/2009/05/scitex-routes-traffic-head-on.html
But we have also learned that now they are going to close it again today to run a marathon. What a joke! http://www.gmanews.tv/story/175322/subic-international-marathon-races-off-on-saturday
The ignorant operators of the SCTEX need to decide if they have built an Expressway or a sporting facility because their dangerous and greedy practices not only deprive motorists of the safe unencumbered roadway that they are paying for but risk the very lives of the motorists who are their customers.
Last Saturday morning I set off for Clark and was absolutely astonished that one side of the SCTEX was closed for a "Bicycle Race".
So we had counterflow on one side only. Not only is this dangerous, it is gross stupidity to close half of a major highway leading to a major tourist destination on a weekend for a "Bicycle Race" Not only that, it was organized by non other than the Department of Tourism!
Needless to say they still collected the full toll fee at the other end.
[The Subic Bulletin] The Subic Bulletin has complained about this issue before, in fact previously when they closed the SCTEX they almost killed motorists by routing traffic head on towards each other http://thesubicbulletin.blogspot.com/2009/05/scitex-routes-traffic-head-on.html
But we have also learned that now they are going to close it again today to run a marathon. What a joke! http://www.gmanews.tv/story/175322/subic-international-marathon-races-off-on-saturday
The ignorant operators of the SCTEX need to decide if they have built an Expressway or a sporting facility because their dangerous and greedy practices not only deprive motorists of the safe unencumbered roadway that they are paying for but risk the very lives of the motorists who are their customers.
Guam Military Buildup
Comment from a reader on Guam Military buildup
I happened to come across a news article that effusively describes job opportunities to be available when Guam undergoes one of the biggest military base buildups ever. Quoting: "US Sens. Judith Guthertz and Rory Respicio said their country is about to undertake in Guam "the United States' greatest military buildup since the end of World War II," referring to the planned construction of a $15-billion base on the island preparatory to the pullout of troops from various American military installations in Japan.
Meeting with officials of the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) here, Guthertz and Respicio urged the SBMA to form a Philippine delegation to Guam to expedite the establishment of a training center in Subic Bay."
My first reaction was, "HUH?" I like to think of myself as reasonably well informed on current and projected military projects. Nobody I know of has a clue regarding any plan for a "huge buildup in Guam, or, for that matter, ANY kind of buildup that place.
There could be such a plan, but cynically speaking, sure sounds like a lot of hoopla for a gigantic scam. Question is, who/whom to be scammed? The news article somewhat disingenuously identifies Madam Guthertz and Mr. Respicio as "U.S. Senators," when in fact they are Territorial Legislature senators.
Territorial legislative entities should not be confused with the 100 members of the U.S. Senate who represent the citizens of our 50 States. I would urge the good people of the Philippines to take with a grain of salt the promises of junketing territorial nabobs who lack real clout with the U.S. Congress that ultimately decides the disposition of military buildups.
[The Subic Bulletin] On this occasion your radar may be malfunctioning, there certainly is a Guam military buildup and a big relocation of troops from Japan to Guam.
You can Google hundreds of stories on the subject but this project plan (click here) may be of more interest than the Hype. Work Begins Jul 2010 and we hope as many Filipinos will be involved in the construction as possible.
I happened to come across a news article that effusively describes job opportunities to be available when Guam undergoes one of the biggest military base buildups ever. Quoting: "US Sens. Judith Guthertz and Rory Respicio said their country is about to undertake in Guam "the United States' greatest military buildup since the end of World War II," referring to the planned construction of a $15-billion base on the island preparatory to the pullout of troops from various American military installations in Japan.
Meeting with officials of the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) here, Guthertz and Respicio urged the SBMA to form a Philippine delegation to Guam to expedite the establishment of a training center in Subic Bay."
My first reaction was, "HUH?" I like to think of myself as reasonably well informed on current and projected military projects. Nobody I know of has a clue regarding any plan for a "huge buildup in Guam, or, for that matter, ANY kind of buildup that place.
There could be such a plan, but cynically speaking, sure sounds like a lot of hoopla for a gigantic scam. Question is, who/whom to be scammed? The news article somewhat disingenuously identifies Madam Guthertz and Mr. Respicio as "U.S. Senators," when in fact they are Territorial Legislature senators.
Territorial legislative entities should not be confused with the 100 members of the U.S. Senate who represent the citizens of our 50 States. I would urge the good people of the Philippines to take with a grain of salt the promises of junketing territorial nabobs who lack real clout with the U.S. Congress that ultimately decides the disposition of military buildups.
[The Subic Bulletin] On this occasion your radar may be malfunctioning, there certainly is a Guam military buildup and a big relocation of troops from Japan to Guam.
You can Google hundreds of stories on the subject but this project plan (click here) may be of more interest than the Hype. Work Begins Jul 2010 and we hope as many Filipinos will be involved in the construction as possible.
Friday, October 23, 2009
Benefiting From Taxpayer Revenues
Comment from a reader on "Main Gate Bridge":
I completely agree with the post about the construction on the SBMA Magsaysay Bridge. I asked SBMA LED about it and their reply was;
"It will open next year"
How will it open next year, if construction never seems to get started? Are there any signs indicating a budget or company for the construction?
Speaking of signs, there must be a law in the Philippines stating costs, company for the Architecture, and the company for the construction, must be posted on the site. (For example take a look at the sign as you come toward the Kalaklan gate by the lighthouse.)
Unfortunately while these signs are supposed to be posted to show transparency, they have turned into nothing more than political posters. Have you ever noticed how these signs will have at least a 1 foot square picture of the politician (Be it the Mayor, the Senator or the opposing camp Congresman) (Like they spent their own money, not the Taxpayers!) And most of the time the amounts are left blank!
Since you see it from both the Magsaysays and the Gordons, one would have to wonder if they have an unwritten agreement between them not to raise a fuss about the other not posting costs?
A recent post had the comments that the Subic Bulletin was here to point out obvious corruption or abuse of power to try and help stop it. Well Subic Bulletin, what's your opinion on this?
[The Subic Bulletin] Its never ceased to amaze us that public officials can promote themselves using taxpayers money, if there wasn't always so many people around would would have considered putting pirate patches and mustaches on their slimy faces using a permanent marker.
It also amazes us that Mayors can get their names painted on Police vehicles, its degrading to the police and the community that we are reminded that the mayor holds the purse strings that place him above the law. The jobs these officials perform is nothing more than administrative, they have no place in promoting themselves over the administration of public funds.
I completely agree with the post about the construction on the SBMA Magsaysay Bridge. I asked SBMA LED about it and their reply was;
"It will open next year"
How will it open next year, if construction never seems to get started? Are there any signs indicating a budget or company for the construction?
Speaking of signs, there must be a law in the Philippines stating costs, company for the Architecture, and the company for the construction, must be posted on the site. (For example take a look at the sign as you come toward the Kalaklan gate by the lighthouse.)
Unfortunately while these signs are supposed to be posted to show transparency, they have turned into nothing more than political posters. Have you ever noticed how these signs will have at least a 1 foot square picture of the politician (Be it the Mayor, the Senator or the opposing camp Congresman) (Like they spent their own money, not the Taxpayers!) And most of the time the amounts are left blank!
Since you see it from both the Magsaysays and the Gordons, one would have to wonder if they have an unwritten agreement between them not to raise a fuss about the other not posting costs?
A recent post had the comments that the Subic Bulletin was here to point out obvious corruption or abuse of power to try and help stop it. Well Subic Bulletin, what's your opinion on this?
[The Subic Bulletin] Its never ceased to amaze us that public officials can promote themselves using taxpayers money, if there wasn't always so many people around would would have considered putting pirate patches and mustaches on their slimy faces using a permanent marker.
It also amazes us that Mayors can get their names painted on Police vehicles, its degrading to the police and the community that we are reminded that the mayor holds the purse strings that place him above the law. The jobs these officials perform is nothing more than administrative, they have no place in promoting themselves over the administration of public funds.
Filipino or Foriegn Owned Bars?
Comment from a reader on "The Bars In Barretto":
I never thought I would say this, but I agree with the author. The recent emergence of so many "Girly" bars has unfortunately diminished Barretto's charm in my view. Yes there have been these types of establishments there for more than 30 years. Most disappeared when the Navy pulled out, then some reemerged only a few years later. None of which were too "in your face". Some over the years even transformed into more "Family oriented" establishments.
Now there seems to be almost as many bars as tourists. Classy establishments with names such as "Wet Spot" are sure to engender pride within the community.
I am no prude and I am far from innocent in these matters, but a line does need to be drawn at some point. Most of these newer establishments are owned, as the author noted, by many who fled Angeles City for one reason or another, with the hopes of re-establishing themselves in the Subic Bay area. Problem is, they tend to bring with them, many of the negative aspects of Angeles City.
[The Subic Bulletin] As pointed out in our original story only one bar owner came from Angeles City and he is quoted as saying that one of the motivators in moving to Subic was to get away from the negative aspects of Angeles City so your comments of bar owners fleeing to Subic like its a refuge is not supported by the facts.
But what disturbs us is that comments like this seem to focus only on the bars that are owned or frequented by foreigners. Have we also cir-cum to the famous crab mentality?
There are girlie-bars all over the Philippines and certainly in almost every barrio serving Filipino customers, more often than not these bars have underage girls and provide a breading ground for unchecked sexually transmitted diseases.
You chose to mention the bar "Wet Spot", which seems somewhat inexplicable, this bar is set back from the road, has no neon or in your face signage and does not have half naked women standing outside like the Filipino owned bars, so how is this more in your face than the Filipino bar across the road that has flashing lights on the edge of the road and half naked women in the street? It seems that these (Filipino owned) establishments are not of concern to the prudes just the ones that are well run and managed while providing a safe environment to foreigners, or is it that they are a better target for pay-offs?
We would suggest the prudes focus on the Filipino bars that spread disease and pedophilia before getting hung up over well run, legitimate businesses, but sorry there is not so much money in it for them.
Probably even the prudes are happy that there is now a 7/11, several meat shops and increased availability of goods and services in Barretto, these arguably, have been brought about by the commerce generated by the presence of the bars aka tourism!
I never thought I would say this, but I agree with the author. The recent emergence of so many "Girly" bars has unfortunately diminished Barretto's charm in my view. Yes there have been these types of establishments there for more than 30 years. Most disappeared when the Navy pulled out, then some reemerged only a few years later. None of which were too "in your face". Some over the years even transformed into more "Family oriented" establishments.
Now there seems to be almost as many bars as tourists. Classy establishments with names such as "Wet Spot" are sure to engender pride within the community.
I am no prude and I am far from innocent in these matters, but a line does need to be drawn at some point. Most of these newer establishments are owned, as the author noted, by many who fled Angeles City for one reason or another, with the hopes of re-establishing themselves in the Subic Bay area. Problem is, they tend to bring with them, many of the negative aspects of Angeles City.
[The Subic Bulletin] As pointed out in our original story only one bar owner came from Angeles City and he is quoted as saying that one of the motivators in moving to Subic was to get away from the negative aspects of Angeles City so your comments of bar owners fleeing to Subic like its a refuge is not supported by the facts.
But what disturbs us is that comments like this seem to focus only on the bars that are owned or frequented by foreigners. Have we also cir-cum to the famous crab mentality?
There are girlie-bars all over the Philippines and certainly in almost every barrio serving Filipino customers, more often than not these bars have underage girls and provide a breading ground for unchecked sexually transmitted diseases.
You chose to mention the bar "Wet Spot", which seems somewhat inexplicable, this bar is set back from the road, has no neon or in your face signage and does not have half naked women standing outside like the Filipino owned bars, so how is this more in your face than the Filipino bar across the road that has flashing lights on the edge of the road and half naked women in the street? It seems that these (Filipino owned) establishments are not of concern to the prudes just the ones that are well run and managed while providing a safe environment to foreigners, or is it that they are a better target for pay-offs?
We would suggest the prudes focus on the Filipino bars that spread disease and pedophilia before getting hung up over well run, legitimate businesses, but sorry there is not so much money in it for them.
Probably even the prudes are happy that there is now a 7/11, several meat shops and increased availability of goods and services in Barretto, these arguably, have been brought about by the commerce generated by the presence of the bars aka tourism!
Thursday, October 22, 2009
The Philippines - Haven For The Worlds Most Corrupt Leaders
Comment from a reader on your post "No More Investment":
As one poster commented.. "It is what it is and always will be". Like totally corrupt nations around the world (look in Africa, South America, etc.), the Philippines will never change unless we have a Marcos-like dictator sweep into power.
He must get rid of all of the politicians, judges, police, etc. Anyone in authority or in a uniform must go. Start over ruling with an iron fist. Death to thieves. After 10 or so years, have elections and proceed with a proper government under the rule of law. Then and only then will things change. Otherwise you are only replacing one crook with another every election. It's self perpetuating.
You would hope that the Marcos-like individual would be benevolant. Too many criminal dictators have risen out of scenarios like what we have in the Philippines right now. Castro, Hitler, Pol Pot and others have risen out of the ashes of extreme poverty and corruption offering hope and vision.
Who in the Philippines could be a new "father" of our country? And not succomb to greed and avarice. Only when we reach rock bottom will there be this revolution, but it will come.... mark my words. It will make Edsa look like a walk in the park.
[The Subic Bulletin] Sadly the Philippines is the only country in the world to appear on the list of the worlds most corrupt leaders more than once.
As one poster commented.. "It is what it is and always will be". Like totally corrupt nations around the world (look in Africa, South America, etc.), the Philippines will never change unless we have a Marcos-like dictator sweep into power.
He must get rid of all of the politicians, judges, police, etc. Anyone in authority or in a uniform must go. Start over ruling with an iron fist. Death to thieves. After 10 or so years, have elections and proceed with a proper government under the rule of law. Then and only then will things change. Otherwise you are only replacing one crook with another every election. It's self perpetuating.
You would hope that the Marcos-like individual would be benevolant. Too many criminal dictators have risen out of scenarios like what we have in the Philippines right now. Castro, Hitler, Pol Pot and others have risen out of the ashes of extreme poverty and corruption offering hope and vision.
Who in the Philippines could be a new "father" of our country? And not succomb to greed and avarice. Only when we reach rock bottom will there be this revolution, but it will come.... mark my words. It will make Edsa look like a walk in the park.
[The Subic Bulletin] Sadly the Philippines is the only country in the world to appear on the list of the worlds most corrupt leaders more than once.
Immigration Departure Charges
Comment from a reader on "Permanent Residency In The Philippines":
I'm a permanent resident with a 13a visa. Every time I leave Philippines, I have to pay departure fees in addtion to the 750.00 airport tax as below:
Upon issuance of Special Return Certificate (SRC), Emigration Clearance Certificate (ECC) Certificate of Exemption (CE) before each departure.
Multiple Special Return Certificate (SCC)
SRC and form
P 1,450.00
ECC P 700.00
Head tax (no head tax for minor) P 250.00
CE (for minor)
P 200.00
Legal research fee P10.00 / item
(except head tax)
Head tax P 250.00
and another:
13a holders pay P2880 on the 1st departure and P2170 on each subsequent departure in that same calander year.
[The Subic Bulletin] Please read the link in the original story Permanent Residency In The Philippines permanent residents 13&13(a) actually pay 2.920 for the first exit and 2,170 for subsequent exits.
Here is the link again:
http://immigration.gov.ph//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=51
I'm a permanent resident with a 13a visa. Every time I leave Philippines, I have to pay departure fees in addtion to the 750.00 airport tax as below:
Upon issuance of Special Return Certificate (SRC), Emigration Clearance Certificate (ECC) Certificate of Exemption (CE) before each departure.
Multiple Special Return Certificate (SCC)
SRC and form
P 1,450.00
ECC P 700.00
Head tax (no head tax for minor) P 250.00
CE (for minor)
P 200.00
Legal research fee P10.00 / item
(except head tax)
Head tax P 250.00
and another:
13a holders pay P2880 on the 1st departure and P2170 on each subsequent departure in that same calander year.
[The Subic Bulletin] Please read the link in the original story Permanent Residency In The Philippines permanent residents 13&13(a) actually pay 2.920 for the first exit and 2,170 for subsequent exits.
Here is the link again:
http://immigration.gov.ph//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=51
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Its a Two Way Street To Barretto
Comment from a reader on "The Bars In Barretto":
It sounds to me like you have not been here very long. Yes it's true that following the Navy pull out and Pinatubo, there were only a few bars left in Olongapo and Baretto. We are only trending back to normal now that the economy is picking up again.
Also consider that what is "sleaze" to you, may be "high quality" to another. Who are you to judge what is or is not "sleaze"? If you want to be isolated, away from the budget minded foreign tourist hustle and bustle, why not relocate to San Antonio, San Marcelino or any number of other sleepy places that would meet your lack of "sleaze" requirement?
Korean Mafia running off all of the Angeles Bar owners? Hardly! Maybe you should give Harry the Horse's website a visit.
Another suggestion.. Stay on the Freeport so you won't have to be exposed to any "sleaze" that may be present in your travels outside of the gate. Barretto has a two way street going in and out.
No need for you to go there at all, right? Lets just call it "boys town" and be done with it.
It sounds to me like you have not been here very long. Yes it's true that following the Navy pull out and Pinatubo, there were only a few bars left in Olongapo and Baretto. We are only trending back to normal now that the economy is picking up again.
Also consider that what is "sleaze" to you, may be "high quality" to another. Who are you to judge what is or is not "sleaze"? If you want to be isolated, away from the budget minded foreign tourist hustle and bustle, why not relocate to San Antonio, San Marcelino or any number of other sleepy places that would meet your lack of "sleaze" requirement?
Korean Mafia running off all of the Angeles Bar owners? Hardly! Maybe you should give Harry the Horse's website a visit.
Another suggestion.. Stay on the Freeport so you won't have to be exposed to any "sleaze" that may be present in your travels outside of the gate. Barretto has a two way street going in and out.
No need for you to go there at all, right? Lets just call it "boys town" and be done with it.
Subic Freeport's State Of Disrepair
Comment from a reader on "World Class Morons":
Just this morning I watched a Winstar van with passengers blow right through the stop signs at the enterance to Royal and several cars coming the opposite way do the same.
There is going to be a serious accident at this intersection, why isn't there police there on a full time basis. They could also stop the cars/trucks/vans cutting through the PTT station????????
[The Subic Bulletin] The cars cut through the PTT to avoid the intersection because its dangerous so its a worse of two evils but it seems that what your suggestion is just a band-aid approach, the real problem there is the traffic lights.
Clark Freeport can maintain all its traffic lights and even install new ones, so why is SBMA so inept at any form of maintenance?
We read about the huge revenues SBMA is making but where is the money going? The SBMA buildings have paint pealing off them, the general condition of the Subic Freeport is going down.
What possible excuse can they have for not fixing traffic lights? This is shameful!
Just this morning I watched a Winstar van with passengers blow right through the stop signs at the enterance to Royal and several cars coming the opposite way do the same.
There is going to be a serious accident at this intersection, why isn't there police there on a full time basis. They could also stop the cars/trucks/vans cutting through the PTT station????????
[The Subic Bulletin] The cars cut through the PTT to avoid the intersection because its dangerous so its a worse of two evils but it seems that what your suggestion is just a band-aid approach, the real problem there is the traffic lights.
Clark Freeport can maintain all its traffic lights and even install new ones, so why is SBMA so inept at any form of maintenance?
We read about the huge revenues SBMA is making but where is the money going? The SBMA buildings have paint pealing off them, the general condition of the Subic Freeport is going down.
What possible excuse can they have for not fixing traffic lights? This is shameful!
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
It's Official - Ayala Mall For Subic Freeport
Real estate giant Ayala Land Inc. (ALI) is investing P3 billion to develop a 7.5-hectare property at the heart of Subic's central business district.
Ayala Land said it has signed a 50-year lease agreement with the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) for the development of the property into an integrated mixed-use community.
Located along Rizal Highway within the Subic Bay Freeport, the mixed-use project will include a shopping mall, a business process outsourcing (BPO) building, and a hotel.
Ayala Land said the project is expected to generate some 10,000 jobs from construction phase to operations. "The company's development will be a catalyst for growth in the Subic-Olongapo corridor and will be a major mixed-use project in the Subic Freeport Zone that is well-planned, integrated, and environmentally sustainable," a representative of Ayala Land said. The mixed-use project in Subic is Ayala Land's second major investment in the area. The company is currently developing the 320-hectare Anvaya Cove in Morong, Bataan.
With a Hotel added to the complex they MUST be going to do something about the drainage channel, maybe this is why the claimed bridge construction has not occurred waiting for Ayala to pay for it all. Wonder if they could fix the traffic lights while they are in the spending mood...
Ayala Land said it has signed a 50-year lease agreement with the Subic Bay Metropolitan Authority (SBMA) for the development of the property into an integrated mixed-use community.
Located along Rizal Highway within the Subic Bay Freeport, the mixed-use project will include a shopping mall, a business process outsourcing (BPO) building, and a hotel.
Ayala Land said the project is expected to generate some 10,000 jobs from construction phase to operations. "The company's development will be a catalyst for growth in the Subic-Olongapo corridor and will be a major mixed-use project in the Subic Freeport Zone that is well-planned, integrated, and environmentally sustainable," a representative of Ayala Land said. The mixed-use project in Subic is Ayala Land's second major investment in the area. The company is currently developing the 320-hectare Anvaya Cove in Morong, Bataan.
With a Hotel added to the complex they MUST be going to do something about the drainage channel, maybe this is why the claimed bridge construction has not occurred waiting for Ayala to pay for it all. Wonder if they could fix the traffic lights while they are in the spending mood...
Failed Democracy or Voter Ignorance
Comment from a reader on your post "Bayside Not Beachside":
Who are the Baloy's? I heard that Carlito is a relative of the Gordon's no surprise! Can anyone tell me what gives them the right to collect fees for access to the Baloy Beach? According to your previous posts the beach cannot be owned? Unfortunately this is democracy, this guy was elected and probably will be re-elected. Proof thst democracy is a failed system!
[The Subic Bulletin] We can only wonder if all elections in the Philippines are rigged or if the people really do elect the same scumbags time and time again.
Who are the Baloy's? I heard that Carlito is a relative of the Gordon's no surprise! Can anyone tell me what gives them the right to collect fees for access to the Baloy Beach? According to your previous posts the beach cannot be owned? Unfortunately this is democracy, this guy was elected and probably will be re-elected. Proof thst democracy is a failed system!
[The Subic Bulletin] We can only wonder if all elections in the Philippines are rigged or if the people really do elect the same scumbags time and time again.
Access To The Mall
Comment from a reader on "Bridge Over Stinky River":
About the shopping mall project proposed for the banks of the Drainage Channel, The Subic Bulletin states: "You won't know where you are when you're inside so who really cares if its next to the 'sticky river'?" One can only hope that a shopping center developer will bet that shoppers will share this sentiment, and accept the risk of building next to an open sewer. Right now, it looks like only such an investment could provide the momentum necessary to break the apparant deadlock between the City of Olongapo and SBMA between rebuilding the main gate bridge, dredging the Drainage Channel, and redevelopment of downtown Olongapo.
About the shopping mall project proposed for the banks of the Drainage Channel, The Subic Bulletin states: "You won't know where you are when you're inside so who really cares if its next to the 'sticky river'?" One can only hope that a shopping center developer will bet that shoppers will share this sentiment, and accept the risk of building next to an open sewer. Right now, it looks like only such an investment could provide the momentum necessary to break the apparant deadlock between the City of Olongapo and SBMA between rebuilding the main gate bridge, dredging the Drainage Channel, and redevelopment of downtown Olongapo.
Monday, October 19, 2009
Murder In The Freeport
Comment from a reader on a murder in the Freeport:
Has anyone heard about an Aeta villager being murdered in the Pamulaklakin forest area?
SBMA police were fishing a body out of the river near that area on Tuesday, Oct. 6, and the Aeta villagers working there said it was a murder.
This is a prime tourist area for Subic and very close to the Binictican housing area. As usual, SBMA has nothing to say about this and leaves residents and investors in the dark.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Has anyone heard about an Aeta villager being murdered in the Pamulaklakin forest area?
SBMA police were fishing a body out of the river near that area on Tuesday, Oct. 6, and the Aeta villagers working there said it was a murder.
This is a prime tourist area for Subic and very close to the Binictican housing area. As usual, SBMA has nothing to say about this and leaves residents and investors in the dark.
Does anyone know anything about this?
Silly Dick
Comment from a reader on "Barretto's Seafront Zone":
You are mistaken when you say that no one has specifically suggested the land from the water to the highway would be taken. As I stated in my first post, Dick Gordon, in his speach to the business community a few years ago, did say exactly that. He stated that all the deeds from IBA were invalid on the beach side of the road, and that property was National land.
[The Subic Bulletin] We would certainly like to see something to support this because there seems no such statement on record, this doesn't mean he didn't say it but would perhaps indicate it was a passing concept or just wanted to gauge reaction to, because that would seem to us to be a silly thing to try and do.
You are mistaken when you say that no one has specifically suggested the land from the water to the highway would be taken. As I stated in my first post, Dick Gordon, in his speach to the business community a few years ago, did say exactly that. He stated that all the deeds from IBA were invalid on the beach side of the road, and that property was National land.
[The Subic Bulletin] We would certainly like to see something to support this because there seems no such statement on record, this doesn't mean he didn't say it but would perhaps indicate it was a passing concept or just wanted to gauge reaction to, because that would seem to us to be a silly thing to try and do.
Sunday, October 18, 2009
Philippine History Story Book
Comment from a reader on "The Transfer Of Power In Philippine History":
Lets get back on theme. We don't need history lessons as we can look it up on the Internet.
There are too many problems to address: the lease situation,the new Cubi hospital fiasco (aka Dennis Thieke), what is happening with Bay Pointe Hospital, excessive building in the Freeport, corrupt SBMA Board of directors etc.
Lets start hitting the hard issues. This is getting to be nothing more then a story book website.
[The Subic Bulletin] As much as we agree we would like to be reporting local issues this subject seems to be of interest to a great number of readers who are sending in comments.
So in regards to Bay Pointe Hospital, excessive building in the Freeport, corrupt SBMA Board of directors, what is your comments? We believe you made a comment on Cubi Hospital previously that was not printed because it made allegations against an individual that did not check out. If you have further information that would help us substantiate these claims let us know but we draw the line at slander of individuals.
In regards to the backlog of history comments lets compile them today in one reading list below. The reader above can consider this "Story Book Sunday" and return on Monday...
Lets get back on theme. We don't need history lessons as we can look it up on the Internet.
There are too many problems to address: the lease situation,the new Cubi hospital fiasco (aka Dennis Thieke), what is happening with Bay Pointe Hospital, excessive building in the Freeport, corrupt SBMA Board of directors etc.
Lets start hitting the hard issues. This is getting to be nothing more then a story book website.
[The Subic Bulletin] As much as we agree we would like to be reporting local issues this subject seems to be of interest to a great number of readers who are sending in comments.
So in regards to Bay Pointe Hospital, excessive building in the Freeport, corrupt SBMA Board of directors, what is your comments? We believe you made a comment on Cubi Hospital previously that was not printed because it made allegations against an individual that did not check out. If you have further information that would help us substantiate these claims let us know but we draw the line at slander of individuals.
In regards to the backlog of history comments lets compile them today in one reading list below. The reader above can consider this "Story Book Sunday" and return on Monday...
Collection Of Reader Comments On Philippine History
Comment from a reader on "The Transfer Of Power In Philippine History":
Interesting that the writer ignores the "so-called" imperialist activities of other nations of Europe. Lets not forget that it was Europeans that settled America.
The sun never set on the British Empire, right? And Aussies were imprisoning their half-caste citizenry well into the 20th century- taking them from their mothers so they could not "propagate". Spanish, Germans, Dutch, French, British and others all spent a great deal of time and effort expanding their empires and the spoils of wars often were those holdings.
Lets don't even get into the Ottomans and that whole region. So I would think that on the big scale, the USA and it's "manifest destiny" activities are miniscule when compared to other countries.
And Another:
As per comments concerning abusive US government and policies. Where may I ask are you from? Perhaps heaven as you look down from above.
Are you now not enjoying the past efforts of my country on behalf of yours? Do you not reside in and enjoy the flood free and safe area built and paid for by the US.
Yes, the US has and does make mistakes, errors in policies and actions. But consider, would you rather have your life as you know it today or would prefer to be under control of the Japanese or Germans?
Your command of English leads me to believe you are neither. Check your history before you heap such scorn upon others who may have helped you and your country in the past.
And Another:
The respondent writes with the convictions of a true patriot, a position which I can only respect, even as I stand un persuaded by the rhetoric.
A point of disagreement relates to whether or not a legitimate government existed PRIOR to the arrival of American naval forces in May, 1898. The writer refers to a "functioning Filipino government."
I must assume that alludes to the dictatorial government set up by the pact of Biak-na-Bato in July, 1897, which was replaced in 1899 by the First Republic, Constitucion Politica de la Republica Filipina (Malolos Convention). Little evidence exists to establish that these fledgling experiments in self government were either legitimate, or functioning. Just because a dedicated group of revolutionaries set up shop and declare themselves to be representatives of an independent nation, does not necessarily a recognized political organization make.
Permit me to draw attention to the American Revolution and the birth of the United States as an independent nation. They didn't gain that status on July 4, 1776 just because a bunch of dedicated folks rose up in Philadelphia to affix their names to a document. Even in the 18th Century, legitimacy of government stemmed from recognition by the community of nations. To the British, the revolutionaries were nothing more than treasonous upstarts, to be treated with contempt and retribution.
Even after France officially recognized the U.S. as an independent nations, many nations did not. It would take five years of bloody revolution, and not with the full support of the people, before the new nation was fully accepted as an independent state. Had it not been for the French, it is probable that the revolution would have failed, and George Washington would now stand with Emilio Aguinaldo as a loser on the long list of nationalistic dreamers.. It is moot if the British would have treated George with the same consideration the Americans afforded Emilio when they captured him in 1901, bringing to an end the short lived First Philippine Republic.
And yes, there is no doubt that those pesky treaties are indeed the ploy of all nations of the world. True, some are violated before the ink is dry on the paper, but such is the making of history. It is a matter of fact that World history is fraught with examples of the strong exercising will over the less strong. Its called survival of the fittest.
I would quibble with the allegation that Spain and America were illegitimate occupiers. Given the accepted international laws of their respective eras, Spain's claim to the Philippine archipelago was legitimate, as was Britain's claim of Canada and the thirteen colonies in the America's. The U.S. claimed sovereignty over the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico and Cuba as the prizes of war and treaty. Compared to the European powers, and later the Japanese, the Americans were a bunch of sissies in the colonial business.
Few Americans will argue that the American expansionism of the late 19th Century was always just, or humanely executed, nor will I attempt to defend the concept of manifest destiny which was prevalent at the time. I would only ask of those who critique U.S. influence in the Philippines, "Where would the nation be today had it not come under the patronage of the hated Americans?" Nobody really knows, but using existing models from other former colonial countries, its not hard to come up with some good guesses.
My curiosity is piqued by the rather ambiguous statement that the Americans have been in the business of overthrowing regimes that stand in their way." Really? I can think of a few instances in which the U.S. has backed some real bums, willing advocates of a strategy that says, "My enemies enemy is my friend," but actually overthrow a regime?
For my edification, will somebody please cite me one single instance in which the U.S. has unilaterally used force to overthrow a regime. Such an action would surely have been cause for international condemnation, which I don't recall happening.
My worthy critic climbs a slippery slope when citing the experience of Hawaii and the Indian nations of the original American territory as examples of American interference in foreign affairs.
Hawaii became a territory, and later a state by choice of the people. The subjugation of the North American Indian, none of whom ever had anything close to a recognized independent government, started a long time before the United States became an independent nation. Whom of us shall apologize for the sins of the Spanish, French and English colonialists who set out to establish a "New World." I think, perhaps, the writer refers to the injustices perpetrated against the Indians in the westward expansion of the late 19th Century.
I see that as a domestic issue, in no way comparable to "overthrowing regimes." Didn't happen on my watch, Chief!
Interesting that the writer ignores the "so-called" imperialist activities of other nations of Europe. Lets not forget that it was Europeans that settled America.
The sun never set on the British Empire, right? And Aussies were imprisoning their half-caste citizenry well into the 20th century- taking them from their mothers so they could not "propagate". Spanish, Germans, Dutch, French, British and others all spent a great deal of time and effort expanding their empires and the spoils of wars often were those holdings.
Lets don't even get into the Ottomans and that whole region. So I would think that on the big scale, the USA and it's "manifest destiny" activities are miniscule when compared to other countries.
And Another:
As per comments concerning abusive US government and policies. Where may I ask are you from? Perhaps heaven as you look down from above.
Are you now not enjoying the past efforts of my country on behalf of yours? Do you not reside in and enjoy the flood free and safe area built and paid for by the US.
Yes, the US has and does make mistakes, errors in policies and actions. But consider, would you rather have your life as you know it today or would prefer to be under control of the Japanese or Germans?
Your command of English leads me to believe you are neither. Check your history before you heap such scorn upon others who may have helped you and your country in the past.
And Another:
The respondent writes with the convictions of a true patriot, a position which I can only respect, even as I stand un persuaded by the rhetoric.
A point of disagreement relates to whether or not a legitimate government existed PRIOR to the arrival of American naval forces in May, 1898. The writer refers to a "functioning Filipino government."
I must assume that alludes to the dictatorial government set up by the pact of Biak-na-Bato in July, 1897, which was replaced in 1899 by the First Republic, Constitucion Politica de la Republica Filipina (Malolos Convention). Little evidence exists to establish that these fledgling experiments in self government were either legitimate, or functioning. Just because a dedicated group of revolutionaries set up shop and declare themselves to be representatives of an independent nation, does not necessarily a recognized political organization make.
Permit me to draw attention to the American Revolution and the birth of the United States as an independent nation. They didn't gain that status on July 4, 1776 just because a bunch of dedicated folks rose up in Philadelphia to affix their names to a document. Even in the 18th Century, legitimacy of government stemmed from recognition by the community of nations. To the British, the revolutionaries were nothing more than treasonous upstarts, to be treated with contempt and retribution.
Even after France officially recognized the U.S. as an independent nations, many nations did not. It would take five years of bloody revolution, and not with the full support of the people, before the new nation was fully accepted as an independent state. Had it not been for the French, it is probable that the revolution would have failed, and George Washington would now stand with Emilio Aguinaldo as a loser on the long list of nationalistic dreamers.. It is moot if the British would have treated George with the same consideration the Americans afforded Emilio when they captured him in 1901, bringing to an end the short lived First Philippine Republic.
And yes, there is no doubt that those pesky treaties are indeed the ploy of all nations of the world. True, some are violated before the ink is dry on the paper, but such is the making of history. It is a matter of fact that World history is fraught with examples of the strong exercising will over the less strong. Its called survival of the fittest.
I would quibble with the allegation that Spain and America were illegitimate occupiers. Given the accepted international laws of their respective eras, Spain's claim to the Philippine archipelago was legitimate, as was Britain's claim of Canada and the thirteen colonies in the America's. The U.S. claimed sovereignty over the Philippines, Guam, Puerto Rico and Cuba as the prizes of war and treaty. Compared to the European powers, and later the Japanese, the Americans were a bunch of sissies in the colonial business.
Few Americans will argue that the American expansionism of the late 19th Century was always just, or humanely executed, nor will I attempt to defend the concept of manifest destiny which was prevalent at the time. I would only ask of those who critique U.S. influence in the Philippines, "Where would the nation be today had it not come under the patronage of the hated Americans?" Nobody really knows, but using existing models from other former colonial countries, its not hard to come up with some good guesses.
My curiosity is piqued by the rather ambiguous statement that the Americans have been in the business of overthrowing regimes that stand in their way." Really? I can think of a few instances in which the U.S. has backed some real bums, willing advocates of a strategy that says, "My enemies enemy is my friend," but actually overthrow a regime?
For my edification, will somebody please cite me one single instance in which the U.S. has unilaterally used force to overthrow a regime. Such an action would surely have been cause for international condemnation, which I don't recall happening.
My worthy critic climbs a slippery slope when citing the experience of Hawaii and the Indian nations of the original American territory as examples of American interference in foreign affairs.
Hawaii became a territory, and later a state by choice of the people. The subjugation of the North American Indian, none of whom ever had anything close to a recognized independent government, started a long time before the United States became an independent nation. Whom of us shall apologize for the sins of the Spanish, French and English colonialists who set out to establish a "New World." I think, perhaps, the writer refers to the injustices perpetrated against the Indians in the westward expansion of the late 19th Century.
I see that as a domestic issue, in no way comparable to "overthrowing regimes." Didn't happen on my watch, Chief!
Saturday, October 17, 2009
Give Them A Couple Of Beers
Comment from a reader on "Bayside Not Beachside":
SB, WRITERS COMMENT ON BAY FRONT, BOARDWALK IS ON THE MONEY. SEVEN YEARS AGO CITY ENG'S CAME TO MY HOTEL, DID SOME MEASUREMENTS, GAVE ME A PAPER SAYING I MUST REMOVE ONE CORNER OF HOTEL/RESTAURANT FOR NEW FOUR LANE HYWAY, PREPPING FOR NEW BOARD WALK, STOP LITES, TURN OFFS FOR PARKING ALONG THE BEACH, MAJOR TOURIST ATTRACTIONS, ETC. MY ILOCANO WIFE LAUGHED WHEN I PRESENTED HER WITH THE ORDED, SAID TO ME, GIVE THEM A COUPLE OF BEERS, THEY ARE PROBABLY LISING.
SB, WRITERS COMMENT ON BAY FRONT, BOARDWALK IS ON THE MONEY. SEVEN YEARS AGO CITY ENG'S CAME TO MY HOTEL, DID SOME MEASUREMENTS, GAVE ME A PAPER SAYING I MUST REMOVE ONE CORNER OF HOTEL/RESTAURANT FOR NEW FOUR LANE HYWAY, PREPPING FOR NEW BOARD WALK, STOP LITES, TURN OFFS FOR PARKING ALONG THE BEACH, MAJOR TOURIST ATTRACTIONS, ETC. MY ILOCANO WIFE LAUGHED WHEN I PRESENTED HER WITH THE ORDED, SAID TO ME, GIVE THEM A COUPLE OF BEERS, THEY ARE PROBABLY LISING.
Friday, October 16, 2009
What Is A Life Worth
Comment from a reader on "Bayside Not Beachside":
At last a comment on the errant Baloy son. THe same guy who was previously implicated in house break ins in Baloy beach. No doubt he will get away with his crime because of who he is. Too bad for the young girls who were dragged under his vehicle to a horrific death. The same treatment for him would be being too kind.
[The Subic Bulletin] He almost got away with it totally! The lives of these young girls obviously meant nothing to him. Thanks goes to the kind sole who chased him down after the hit and run. Even after apprehension, he paid off the families a mere 70k for killing each of the girls and 30k for the Funerals. Life is so cheap when you have friends in influential places...
At last a comment on the errant Baloy son. THe same guy who was previously implicated in house break ins in Baloy beach. No doubt he will get away with his crime because of who he is. Too bad for the young girls who were dragged under his vehicle to a horrific death. The same treatment for him would be being too kind.
[The Subic Bulletin] He almost got away with it totally! The lives of these young girls obviously meant nothing to him. Thanks goes to the kind sole who chased him down after the hit and run. Even after apprehension, he paid off the families a mere 70k for killing each of the girls and 30k for the Funerals. Life is so cheap when you have friends in influential places...
Thursday, October 15, 2009
We Prefer Subic
Comment from a reader on "Subic Freeport, Not The Provincial Lifestyle":
you got it right dudes... whoever wants to get out of Subic, of course, that's your choice but we prefer to stay here and feel more comfortable...so we are staying.... simple as that.... good bye for those who want to go.... good luck!
[The Subic Bulletin] Well Said!
you got it right dudes... whoever wants to get out of Subic, of course, that's your choice but we prefer to stay here and feel more comfortable...so we are staying.... simple as that.... good bye for those who want to go.... good luck!
[The Subic Bulletin] Well Said!
Spell Check Please
Comment from a reader on "Fighting The Greed":
How about running these comments through spell check guys?
[The Subic Bulletin] All readers pleased be advised that The Subic Bulletin does not want to edit reader comments in any way. As this reader rightly points out, if your send it in with spelling mistakes that is how we will publish it. We feel it is important to the integrity of the site to publish exactly what is submitted.
How about running these comments through spell check guys?
[The Subic Bulletin] All readers pleased be advised that The Subic Bulletin does not want to edit reader comments in any way. As this reader rightly points out, if your send it in with spelling mistakes that is how we will publish it. We feel it is important to the integrity of the site to publish exactly what is submitted.
Wednesday, October 14, 2009
Fighting The Greed
Comment from a reader on "Leasehold Rights Certificates: A Thinly Disguised ...":
I AS A RESIDENT FO A NUMBER OF YEARS NOW WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO DONATE TO OUR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO FIGHT THIS NEW BUT NOT UNUSUAL SCAM SBMA IS ATTEMPTING TO AS ANOTHER MANIPULATION OF US SO CALLED ""WEALTHY , GREEDY EXPATS ""
MOST OF US BLUE COLLAR WORKERS NEVER HEARD OF GREED UNTILL MOVEING HERE !!!!
[The Subic Bulletin] We are all waiting for the Chamber to do something...
I AS A RESIDENT FO A NUMBER OF YEARS NOW WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO DONATE TO OUR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TO FIGHT THIS NEW BUT NOT UNUSUAL SCAM SBMA IS ATTEMPTING TO AS ANOTHER MANIPULATION OF US SO CALLED ""WEALTHY , GREEDY EXPATS ""
MOST OF US BLUE COLLAR WORKERS NEVER HEARD OF GREED UNTILL MOVEING HERE !!!!
[The Subic Bulletin] We are all waiting for the Chamber to do something...
Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Subic Airport's Target Market
Comment from a reader on Subic Airport's marketing Activities
In an address to the membership of the Subic Bay Chamber of Commerce on September 29, the General Manager of the Airport said that the first thing airlines asked upon being approached was what was Subic Bay International Airport's "market." In the ensuing address, the General Manager stated the Airport's conclusions with respect to that question, and announced that their conclusions had led them to seek the initiation of flights between Subic and Cebu, starting in November 2009. No mention was made of SBIA's most salient market--sex tourists--and scant mention was made of the source of those tourists--Guam.
A number of new hotels are rising in the entertainment district in Angeles City. The Airport should suggest to its resident carrier, Pearl of the Pacific Airlines, that it sell blocks of seats on Guam-Subic flights to one or more of those hotels--enough seats to pay for the operating costs of the flights.
It would take only a small advertisement in the local Guam newspaper to fill those seats every week. Flights should leave Subic on Friday afternoon and return from Guam on Friday nights, and go again to Guam on Sunday afternoon and return on Sunday nights. A bus could shuttle the sex tourists to their hotel in Angeles City as soon as they emerge from Customs. The remaining seats on the flights could be filled by gamblers, medical tourists, golfers, divers, fishermen, and eco-tourists.
This is a more likely proposition than flights to Cebu.
[The Subic Bulletin] SBIA is stabbing in the dark and hoping that they get lucky because they clearly don't have a clue what their target market is or how to approach it.
In an address to the membership of the Subic Bay Chamber of Commerce on September 29, the General Manager of the Airport said that the first thing airlines asked upon being approached was what was Subic Bay International Airport's "market." In the ensuing address, the General Manager stated the Airport's conclusions with respect to that question, and announced that their conclusions had led them to seek the initiation of flights between Subic and Cebu, starting in November 2009. No mention was made of SBIA's most salient market--sex tourists--and scant mention was made of the source of those tourists--Guam.
A number of new hotels are rising in the entertainment district in Angeles City. The Airport should suggest to its resident carrier, Pearl of the Pacific Airlines, that it sell blocks of seats on Guam-Subic flights to one or more of those hotels--enough seats to pay for the operating costs of the flights.
It would take only a small advertisement in the local Guam newspaper to fill those seats every week. Flights should leave Subic on Friday afternoon and return from Guam on Friday nights, and go again to Guam on Sunday afternoon and return on Sunday nights. A bus could shuttle the sex tourists to their hotel in Angeles City as soon as they emerge from Customs. The remaining seats on the flights could be filled by gamblers, medical tourists, golfers, divers, fishermen, and eco-tourists.
This is a more likely proposition than flights to Cebu.
[The Subic Bulletin] SBIA is stabbing in the dark and hoping that they get lucky because they clearly don't have a clue what their target market is or how to approach it.
Where The Law Is Only A Suggestion
Comment from a reader on "Government Provided Consumer Protection":
laws are one thing, but observing them and enforcing them is another matter.
[The Subic Bulletin] Welcome to the Philippines. I always remember before PLDT owned PLDT.com it had a slogan on that site that said; "The Philippines, where the law is only a suggestion".
laws are one thing, but observing them and enforcing them is another matter.
[The Subic Bulletin] Welcome to the Philippines. I always remember before PLDT owned PLDT.com it had a slogan on that site that said; "The Philippines, where the law is only a suggestion".
Monday, October 12, 2009
Subic Chamber Should Lead The Fight
Comment from a reader on "Leasehold Rights Certificates: A Thinly Disguised ...":
The Subic Bay Chamber of Commerce should establish a "Subic Bay Leaseholders Legal Defense Fund" and solicit donations. With this money, the Chamber should hire an attorney to bring suit against SBMA, seeking an injunction against SBMA's imposition of the title registry requirement and appurtenant fees.
[The Subic Bulletin] We agree, this would be an appropriate move and one were the Chamber should show their value to the local community.
The Subic Bay Chamber of Commerce should establish a "Subic Bay Leaseholders Legal Defense Fund" and solicit donations. With this money, the Chamber should hire an attorney to bring suit against SBMA, seeking an injunction against SBMA's imposition of the title registry requirement and appurtenant fees.
[The Subic Bulletin] We agree, this would be an appropriate move and one were the Chamber should show their value to the local community.
Sunday, October 11, 2009
No Money Back Guarantee In The Philippines
Comment from a reader on "Government Provided Consumer Protection":
hear hear.
Perhaps a peek into the Brit education system woudn't hurt either.
On a recent trip to the states, I also noticed that most businesses had a 15-30 day money back guarantee on products. Once I had to return something just because I decided I no longer wanted it. To my amazement I didn't have to lie or make up any excuses for my decision and received a full refund on the spot.
Compare that to, here, where you'll be lucky to get a 3-day warranty and never have I witnessed money being returned to a consumer, even if the product is faulty.
I think we just have to face facts that there are a lot of procedures and laws that at one time worked in the middle ages, but no longer apply today and need to be revised, but who has the time to do that? especially when there's no money in it (which tends to win over goodwill any day)
hear hear.
Perhaps a peek into the Brit education system woudn't hurt either.
On a recent trip to the states, I also noticed that most businesses had a 15-30 day money back guarantee on products. Once I had to return something just because I decided I no longer wanted it. To my amazement I didn't have to lie or make up any excuses for my decision and received a full refund on the spot.
Compare that to, here, where you'll be lucky to get a 3-day warranty and never have I witnessed money being returned to a consumer, even if the product is faulty.
I think we just have to face facts that there are a lot of procedures and laws that at one time worked in the middle ages, but no longer apply today and need to be revised, but who has the time to do that? especially when there's no money in it (which tends to win over goodwill any day)
No More Investment
Comment on your post "No Security For Subic Investors":
Plenty have left, have a look at the Acer Computer history, This is happening all around the PI, each new administration changes the rules and the court system here supports these thieves.
I for one will be investing not one more penny in this country.
Plenty have left, have a look at the Acer Computer history, This is happening all around the PI, each new administration changes the rules and the court system here supports these thieves.
I for one will be investing not one more penny in this country.
Saturday, October 10, 2009
The Bars In Barretto
Comment from a reader on "Casino Bars For Barretto":
As a long time resident, you should know that all the slezy bar owners in Angeles City are being run out by the new Korean mafia and they are buying up the bars in Barretto.
Yes, in fact, Barretto is IN FACT becoming the new Fields Avenue and it makes me sick. THey should all be shut down for the good of the community.
[The Subic Bulletin] There have been bars in Barretto since the mid 1980's, and at one time there were over 40 bars and watering holes. Nothing has really changed in the last 30 years or so, except for the outward presence of these bars. They are now more visible to the casual observer.
The bars collectively employ 600+ people; some local residents, and some who moved to the area to work.
In no small way, the bars contribute to the local economy, through direct purchasing of goods and services, payment of fees and taxes, etc.
Indirectly, the bars, their staff and their patrons are the primary reason for the emergence and existence of most of the eateries, convenience outlets, and the abundance of clean tricycles available.
Indirect employment because of the presence of the bars is probably on a 1:1 scale, so there are as many as 600 people who there livelihood to the existence of the bars, as well as those employed directly by the bars.
I'm sure local government services would be lessened if not for the presence of the bars, and the tourists they bring.
Or maybe I'm taking too broad a view of the benefits the bars have provided to the local community!
And as for the comments about bars and ownership in Angeles, only one (1) bar owner/operator has relocated.
As a long time resident, you should know that all the slezy bar owners in Angeles City are being run out by the new Korean mafia and they are buying up the bars in Barretto.
Yes, in fact, Barretto is IN FACT becoming the new Fields Avenue and it makes me sick. THey should all be shut down for the good of the community.
[The Subic Bulletin] There have been bars in Barretto since the mid 1980's, and at one time there were over 40 bars and watering holes. Nothing has really changed in the last 30 years or so, except for the outward presence of these bars. They are now more visible to the casual observer.
The bars collectively employ 600+ people; some local residents, and some who moved to the area to work.
In no small way, the bars contribute to the local economy, through direct purchasing of goods and services, payment of fees and taxes, etc.
Indirectly, the bars, their staff and their patrons are the primary reason for the emergence and existence of most of the eateries, convenience outlets, and the abundance of clean tricycles available.
Indirect employment because of the presence of the bars is probably on a 1:1 scale, so there are as many as 600 people who there livelihood to the existence of the bars, as well as those employed directly by the bars.
I'm sure local government services would be lessened if not for the presence of the bars, and the tourists they bring.
Or maybe I'm taking too broad a view of the benefits the bars have provided to the local community!
And as for the comments about bars and ownership in Angeles, only one (1) bar owner/operator has relocated.
Friday, October 9, 2009
Bridge Over Stinky River
Comment from a reader on "Main Gate Bridge":
I heard rumors about disputes between sbma and city mayor.. over various things. obviously closing that bridge hurts magsaysay businesses and freeport businesses. Some people simply choose not to drive out there in that traffic any more, and vice versa.
There is also the issue also about the new mall project that is going to go over in that area, which is obviously too small for any sizable shopping center and parking, etc. So many huge vacant areas on the freeport that would be far more amenable to a shopping mall but one wonders why it has to be built along a stinky river in a place that would be extremely congested with people and vehicles.
[The Subic Bulletin] For any shopping mall project to go ahead in the Freeport it needs to be accessible to the people of Olongapo and surrounds. These people don't have cars and could not affords Windstar's exorbitant prices, so its clear the mall needs to be close to the people next to the river is the only obvious choice. You won't know where you are when your inside so who really cares if its next to the "sticky river"?
I heard rumors about disputes between sbma and city mayor.. over various things. obviously closing that bridge hurts magsaysay businesses and freeport businesses. Some people simply choose not to drive out there in that traffic any more, and vice versa.
There is also the issue also about the new mall project that is going to go over in that area, which is obviously too small for any sizable shopping center and parking, etc. So many huge vacant areas on the freeport that would be far more amenable to a shopping mall but one wonders why it has to be built along a stinky river in a place that would be extremely congested with people and vehicles.
[The Subic Bulletin] For any shopping mall project to go ahead in the Freeport it needs to be accessible to the people of Olongapo and surrounds. These people don't have cars and could not affords Windstar's exorbitant prices, so its clear the mall needs to be close to the people next to the river is the only obvious choice. You won't know where you are when your inside so who really cares if its next to the "sticky river"?
What Is The Motivation
Comment from a reader on "The Responsibilities Of Investors, Korean Or Not!":
so much for the "new" subic bulletin being less racist and more even-handed
[The Subic Bulletin] The story this reader was commenting on made a specific point that the same rules should apply to everyone of all nationalities, how can he suggest that this is racist?
We find it curious that the racist accusations only come out when anything Korean is mentioned.
Is this a tactic of some individuals to suppress any stories about Koreans possibly from those who are making so much money servicing the Korean investors that they don't want anything to upset their cashflow? What is the real motivation here?
Just for the record we have received a number of reader comments that we have not published because we felt they actually were racist.
so much for the "new" subic bulletin being less racist and more even-handed
[The Subic Bulletin] The story this reader was commenting on made a specific point that the same rules should apply to everyone of all nationalities, how can he suggest that this is racist?
We find it curious that the racist accusations only come out when anything Korean is mentioned.
Is this a tactic of some individuals to suppress any stories about Koreans possibly from those who are making so much money servicing the Korean investors that they don't want anything to upset their cashflow? What is the real motivation here?
Just for the record we have received a number of reader comments that we have not published because we felt they actually were racist.
Thursday, October 8, 2009
Subic Bay From Magellan To Pinatubo
Comment from author Gerald Anderson on Philippine - American History 101
During a recent exchange on the board a reader commented that my book "Subic Bay From Magellan To Pinatubo: The History Of The U.S. Naval Station, Subic Bay" had "numerous uncorrected errors." As the author of this book I would appreciate his input on those errors, not to debate them but to consider them for updates in future editions of the book. The book was recently reprinted in its third edition and I would expect it to be updated and reprinted in a year or so as new information becomes available and my time permits.
His comment that the book is not intended as a "geo-political reference" is absolutely correct. It is, as the title states, a history of the U.S. Navy at Subic Bay. The target reader is sailors that were stationed at Subic or spent time there on deployments, etc. It was originally published in 1991 and is still selling well on Amazon.
You may be interested to note that I have recently released "Children of the Sun". This book picks up at the departure of the Americans.
Regards,
Gerald R. Anderson
During a recent exchange on the board a reader commented that my book "Subic Bay From Magellan To Pinatubo: The History Of The U.S. Naval Station, Subic Bay" had "numerous uncorrected errors." As the author of this book I would appreciate his input on those errors, not to debate them but to consider them for updates in future editions of the book. The book was recently reprinted in its third edition and I would expect it to be updated and reprinted in a year or so as new information becomes available and my time permits.
His comment that the book is not intended as a "geo-political reference" is absolutely correct. It is, as the title states, a history of the U.S. Navy at Subic Bay. The target reader is sailors that were stationed at Subic or spent time there on deployments, etc. It was originally published in 1991 and is still selling well on Amazon.
You may be interested to note that I have recently released "Children of the Sun". This book picks up at the departure of the Americans.
Regards,
Gerald R. Anderson
Wednesday, October 7, 2009
Bayside Not Beachside
Comment by a reader on "Casino Bars For Barretto":
Baretto development? Hah. Sounds like someone wants to make silk out of a sow's ear. It is what it is and shall forever be.
The Freeport has all the advantages already yet cannot create a nice beachfront environment with clean sand and water.. any resort beach development in Baretto would require replacing the dirty brown sand with some white stuff, but every year it would wash away. Who can afford that?
The low budget tourists going to Baloy seem to be having a lot of fun with things exactly the way they are. Boardwalk? The wood would be removed in a week to build someones squatter shack.
Everyone needs to get real about true potential. Take away the cheap destination and attractions (bars, dirty beach, inexpensive restaurants and hotels) and you will have nothing left but Dick's picture.
[The Subic Bulletin] Given the untimely death of the two young girls dragged along under the car of a drunken family member of the Baringay Captain last week, Barretto is looking less of a pleasant place for pedestrians. Having got that off our chests, your points are principally sound that we don't want it to change Barretto too much at all and certainly your concept of white sand etc does not belong there.
A promenade that was made of stone or (concrete that looked like stone) and provided a tourist walk along the shore with the backs of the current establishments providing seaside refreshments still sounds appealing to us. Anyone who has been to Sabang in Puerto Gallera will tell you that walking down the beachfront and checking out the bars and restaurants is one of the most appealing parts of visiting there. It doesn't make the establishments more expensive just more accessible and enjoyable.
Baretto development? Hah. Sounds like someone wants to make silk out of a sow's ear. It is what it is and shall forever be.
The Freeport has all the advantages already yet cannot create a nice beachfront environment with clean sand and water.. any resort beach development in Baretto would require replacing the dirty brown sand with some white stuff, but every year it would wash away. Who can afford that?
The low budget tourists going to Baloy seem to be having a lot of fun with things exactly the way they are. Boardwalk? The wood would be removed in a week to build someones squatter shack.
Everyone needs to get real about true potential. Take away the cheap destination and attractions (bars, dirty beach, inexpensive restaurants and hotels) and you will have nothing left but Dick's picture.
[The Subic Bulletin] Given the untimely death of the two young girls dragged along under the car of a drunken family member of the Baringay Captain last week, Barretto is looking less of a pleasant place for pedestrians. Having got that off our chests, your points are principally sound that we don't want it to change Barretto too much at all and certainly your concept of white sand etc does not belong there.
A promenade that was made of stone or (concrete that looked like stone) and provided a tourist walk along the shore with the backs of the current establishments providing seaside refreshments still sounds appealing to us. Anyone who has been to Sabang in Puerto Gallera will tell you that walking down the beachfront and checking out the bars and restaurants is one of the most appealing parts of visiting there. It doesn't make the establishments more expensive just more accessible and enjoyable.
Provincial Or Polluted
Comment from a reader on "Subic Freeport, Not The Provincial Lifestyle":
You will feel differently about the provincial lifestyle when your water well (only source of drinking water) in San Antonio becomes polluted due to untrammaled development.
You will feel differently about the provincial lifestyle when your water well (only source of drinking water) in San Antonio becomes polluted due to untrammaled development.
Tuesday, October 6, 2009
Permanent Residency In The Philippines
The following comment was sent in by one of our readers who sort advice after reading our story What Value Is A Permantent Visa? unfortunately the advice is not very good so we will try to clear it up for him:
[Reader] Do holders of SRRV have to pay the travel tax and the Immigration charge when leaving/entering P.?I.
[Advisor] No, that is incorrect information. SRRV holders are exempt from any fees except the mandatory airport tax of P750.00.
[The Subic Bulletin] Nothing in our story mentioned the SRRV, we talk about Legal Resident or also called Permanent Resident, this is not just for retirees but the majority of residents who hold a 13 or 13(a) Visa. The SRRV does not pay immigration charges but the SRRV is more of a marketing visa than the traditional Visa so there are some differences like for example the holder of an SRRV cannot work in the Philippines.
[Reader] All in can remember is paying an Airport tax when leaving the country, but it wasn't P1650.
[Adviser] He is referring to TRAVEL TAX, again, SRRV holders are exempt from travel tax, providing they leave once a year. If they don't avail of departure annually, they are required to pay this tax (as per Bureau of Immigration regulations)
[The Subic Bulletin] Your adviser is correct that if the SRRV holder (who cannot earn an income in the Philippines) is traveling regularly they wont pay the tax, however, we don't know that many retirees that travel every year so in many cases they will still end up paying the tax. It is P1,650 additional to the Airport Fee which varies from airport to airport.
[Reader] Is this something new?
[Adviser] no it isn't.. I don't know where he comes up with 2170 Immigration charges ...the only other fees that he might be referring to, could be IF he is on a tourist visa and overstayed his 59 day deadline.
Please note he refers to "legal residents" A tourist visa is NOT defined as a "resident"..The ACR-I card, SSWV, SIRV, SSIV or a SRRV, provides "residency status" then there are various regulations for differentiations between temporary resident and permanent resident, which I won't get into at the moment. Suggest you submit a post to Bulletin for benefit of SRRV holders.
It is most unfortunate that incorrect information such as some postings on the Bulletin will be taken as gospel. While semi-complicated, these issues are easy to check out with BI Olongapo and clearly spelled out on the BI website..www.immigration.gov.ph
[The Subic Bulletin] Clearly your adviser should take their own advice and review the Immigration website, there they will find information about residency and a list of fees payable by permanent residents (13 and 13a visa holders specifically) when departing the country.
See this link:
http://immigration.gov.ph//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=5
[Reader] Do holders of SRRV have to pay the travel tax and the Immigration charge when leaving/entering P.?I.
[Advisor] No, that is incorrect information. SRRV holders are exempt from any fees except the mandatory airport tax of P750.00.
[The Subic Bulletin] Nothing in our story mentioned the SRRV, we talk about Legal Resident or also called Permanent Resident, this is not just for retirees but the majority of residents who hold a 13 or 13(a) Visa. The SRRV does not pay immigration charges but the SRRV is more of a marketing visa than the traditional Visa so there are some differences like for example the holder of an SRRV cannot work in the Philippines.
[Reader] All in can remember is paying an Airport tax when leaving the country, but it wasn't P1650.
[Adviser] He is referring to TRAVEL TAX, again, SRRV holders are exempt from travel tax, providing they leave once a year. If they don't avail of departure annually, they are required to pay this tax (as per Bureau of Immigration regulations)
[The Subic Bulletin] Your adviser is correct that if the SRRV holder (who cannot earn an income in the Philippines) is traveling regularly they wont pay the tax, however, we don't know that many retirees that travel every year so in many cases they will still end up paying the tax. It is P1,650 additional to the Airport Fee which varies from airport to airport.
[Reader] Is this something new?
[Adviser] no it isn't.. I don't know where he comes up with 2170 Immigration charges ...the only other fees that he might be referring to, could be IF he is on a tourist visa and overstayed his 59 day deadline.
Please note he refers to "legal residents" A tourist visa is NOT defined as a "resident"..The ACR-I card, SSWV, SIRV, SSIV or a SRRV, provides "residency status" then there are various regulations for differentiations between temporary resident and permanent resident, which I won't get into at the moment. Suggest you submit a post to Bulletin for benefit of SRRV holders.
It is most unfortunate that incorrect information such as some postings on the Bulletin will be taken as gospel. While semi-complicated, these issues are easy to check out with BI Olongapo and clearly spelled out on the BI website..www.immigration.gov.ph
[The Subic Bulletin] Clearly your adviser should take their own advice and review the Immigration website, there they will find information about residency and a list of fees payable by permanent residents (13 and 13a visa holders specifically) when departing the country.
See this link:
http://immigration.gov.ph//index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=205&Itemid=5
Monday, October 5, 2009
Leasehold Rights Certificates: A Thinly Disguised Property Tax
Comment from a reader on SBMA's plan for the issuance of "Certificates of Ownership of Leasehold Rights"
SBMA's new requirement that leaseholders obtain "Certificates of Ownership of Leasehold Rights" is a transparent attempt on the part of SBMA to impose a periodically payable property tax on leaseholders.
Buried deep in the "Implementing Rules and Regulations Registry of Certificate of Ownership of Leasehold Rights (Registry Office)" is the following section (in Part III, Rule 2 of those Rules):
Section 7. Validity – All certificates of ownership of leasehold rights shall be valid for a period stated on the face thereon and shall be renewable (i) upon approval of the Board; (ii) payment of the prescribed fees; and (iii) submission of the required supporting documents.
This means that leaseholders who go through the hassle and expense of obtaining a Certificate of Ownership of Leasehold rights for their property could, and undoubtedly would, find that their Certificates are valid for less than the remaining term of their lease, requiring them to pay more "fees" to renew their Certificates upon their Certificates' expiration. (Not to be confused with amendment of Certificates of Ownership of Leasehold Rights upon extension of the underlying lease term, which is addressed by a separate section in those Rules--Section 13 of Rule III, Part III of the Rules).
Presumably, a failure to renew would subject the leaseholder to the fines provided for failure to obtain a Certificate.
SBMA is quite sneaky in how they are proceeding--having everyone sign up under the impression that this is a one time payment, and then issuing certificates that will require periodic renewal. Leaseholders will be given the choice of paying up at renewal time, or having the penalty for failure to obtain a certificate added to their bill at the SBMA Accounting Office.
SBMA can then withhold approval of assignment of leases until the bill (including fine) is cleared.
Fortunately, their scheme is clearly illegal under Philippine Law.
Such an arbitrary limitation of the period of the validity of the Certificates to less than the remaining term of the leasehold would transform the "fees" assessed in connection with the renewal of the Certificate from a fee to tax, which would violate Section 12 of Republic Act No. 7227, as amended, which provides:
"The provisions of existing laws, rules and regulations to the contrary notwithstanding, no taxes, local and national, shall be imposed within the Subic Special Economic Zone. In lieu of paying taxes, three percent (3%) of the gross income earned by all businesses and enterprises within the Subic Special Economic Zone shall be remitted to the National Government, one percent (1%) of the gross income earned by all business enterprises within the Subic Special Economic Zone to be utilized for the development of municipalities outside the City of Olongapo and the Municipality of Subic, and other municipalities contiguous to the base areas.
Even were such renewal fees legally defensible as "fees", instead of "taxes", such renewal fees, like fees assessed in connection with the original issuance of the Certificates, would vary the terms of the leases leaseholders have with SBMA, and as such violate Section 10, Article III, of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which provides:"No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be imposed".
Someone needs to bring suit against SBMA.
[The Subic Bulletin] We agree with your assessment and if it will take a legal case then so be it. We think most people are waiting to hear a plan of action from the Subic Chamber of Commerce who is seeking legal advice on this matter.
We think most leaseholders in the Freeport would be happy put in a contribution for a case because this is the protection of rights against bullying from an out-of-control government body. If SBMA is successful in doing this what would be next?
SBMA's new requirement that leaseholders obtain "Certificates of Ownership of Leasehold Rights" is a transparent attempt on the part of SBMA to impose a periodically payable property tax on leaseholders.
Buried deep in the "Implementing Rules and Regulations Registry of Certificate of Ownership of Leasehold Rights (Registry Office)" is the following section (in Part III, Rule 2 of those Rules):
Section 7. Validity – All certificates of ownership of leasehold rights shall be valid for a period stated on the face thereon and shall be renewable (i) upon approval of the Board; (ii) payment of the prescribed fees; and (iii) submission of the required supporting documents.
This means that leaseholders who go through the hassle and expense of obtaining a Certificate of Ownership of Leasehold rights for their property could, and undoubtedly would, find that their Certificates are valid for less than the remaining term of their lease, requiring them to pay more "fees" to renew their Certificates upon their Certificates' expiration. (Not to be confused with amendment of Certificates of Ownership of Leasehold Rights upon extension of the underlying lease term, which is addressed by a separate section in those Rules--Section 13 of Rule III, Part III of the Rules).
Presumably, a failure to renew would subject the leaseholder to the fines provided for failure to obtain a Certificate.
SBMA is quite sneaky in how they are proceeding--having everyone sign up under the impression that this is a one time payment, and then issuing certificates that will require periodic renewal. Leaseholders will be given the choice of paying up at renewal time, or having the penalty for failure to obtain a certificate added to their bill at the SBMA Accounting Office.
SBMA can then withhold approval of assignment of leases until the bill (including fine) is cleared.
Fortunately, their scheme is clearly illegal under Philippine Law.
Such an arbitrary limitation of the period of the validity of the Certificates to less than the remaining term of the leasehold would transform the "fees" assessed in connection with the renewal of the Certificate from a fee to tax, which would violate Section 12 of Republic Act No. 7227, as amended, which provides:
"The provisions of existing laws, rules and regulations to the contrary notwithstanding, no taxes, local and national, shall be imposed within the Subic Special Economic Zone. In lieu of paying taxes, three percent (3%) of the gross income earned by all businesses and enterprises within the Subic Special Economic Zone shall be remitted to the National Government, one percent (1%) of the gross income earned by all business enterprises within the Subic Special Economic Zone to be utilized for the development of municipalities outside the City of Olongapo and the Municipality of Subic, and other municipalities contiguous to the base areas.
Even were such renewal fees legally defensible as "fees", instead of "taxes", such renewal fees, like fees assessed in connection with the original issuance of the Certificates, would vary the terms of the leases leaseholders have with SBMA, and as such violate Section 10, Article III, of the 1987 Philippine Constitution, which provides:"No law impairing the obligation of contracts shall be imposed".
Someone needs to bring suit against SBMA.
[The Subic Bulletin] We agree with your assessment and if it will take a legal case then so be it. We think most people are waiting to hear a plan of action from the Subic Chamber of Commerce who is seeking legal advice on this matter.
We think most leaseholders in the Freeport would be happy put in a contribution for a case because this is the protection of rights against bullying from an out-of-control government body. If SBMA is successful in doing this what would be next?
Sunday, October 4, 2009
The Transfer Of Power In Philippine History
Comment from a reader on "History Rekindled":
How can it be said that in 1898 and 1899 "there was no such thing as a Filipino based government to infringe on'?
While our American friend has much of interest to say, surely it is a biased view that the Filipinos did not have an independent government.
As he admits, Filipinos had taken over Luzon except Manila (we will leave out the rest of the Filipinos outside Luzon for the purposes of this argument).
It is a classic ploy of American-and other- Imperialists to rely legalistically on such things as treaties,which of course favor them. And which they have the power-especially military-to impose on others.
It surely is the case that after June 1898 there was a functioning Filipino government and that the secret deal worked out between the Spaniards and the Americans-both illegitimate occupiers-plus a treaty cobbled together to transfer domination from one colonial power to another-can only be called a regime change, an immoral and unjust act, against the proclaimed independence-indeed sovereignty-of the young Filipino Republic. A good read-Kinzer's Overthrow.
The Americans have been in the "business" of overthrowing regimes that stand in their way for a very long time.
Hawaii was even before the Philippines-and of course so were the "Indian nations" of the original American territory.
How can it be said that in 1898 and 1899 "there was no such thing as a Filipino based government to infringe on'?
While our American friend has much of interest to say, surely it is a biased view that the Filipinos did not have an independent government.
As he admits, Filipinos had taken over Luzon except Manila (we will leave out the rest of the Filipinos outside Luzon for the purposes of this argument).
It is a classic ploy of American-and other- Imperialists to rely legalistically on such things as treaties,which of course favor them. And which they have the power-especially military-to impose on others.
It surely is the case that after June 1898 there was a functioning Filipino government and that the secret deal worked out between the Spaniards and the Americans-both illegitimate occupiers-plus a treaty cobbled together to transfer domination from one colonial power to another-can only be called a regime change, an immoral and unjust act, against the proclaimed independence-indeed sovereignty-of the young Filipino Republic. A good read-Kinzer's Overthrow.
The Americans have been in the "business" of overthrowing regimes that stand in their way for a very long time.
Hawaii was even before the Philippines-and of course so were the "Indian nations" of the original American territory.
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Guam - Final Destination...
Comment from a reader on "Calling Passengers For Subic Guam Flights":
Egads, I guess I did obfuscate the issue with too much in the way of extreme analogy. Sorry, SB, I stand chastised. Essentially, all I needed to say was I find it ludicrous that anybody would be so bold as to take a relatively small City in the Philippines and give it "sister" status with an entire territory of another country. Guam may be a lot of things, but a "city" it certainly isn't.
On the obtuse, I'm stunned to learn that only one airline with only one airplane will be available. Huh?
Good gosh, will that be sufficient to satisfy the transportation needs of the "sex tourists?" One can only wonder if Fr. Shay Cullen is on top of this logistic shortfall.
[The Subic Bulletin] One thing is for sure if that plane has sat at Subic for several years without use, we don't want to be on the first flight!
Egads, I guess I did obfuscate the issue with too much in the way of extreme analogy. Sorry, SB, I stand chastised. Essentially, all I needed to say was I find it ludicrous that anybody would be so bold as to take a relatively small City in the Philippines and give it "sister" status with an entire territory of another country. Guam may be a lot of things, but a "city" it certainly isn't.
On the obtuse, I'm stunned to learn that only one airline with only one airplane will be available. Huh?
Good gosh, will that be sufficient to satisfy the transportation needs of the "sex tourists?" One can only wonder if Fr. Shay Cullen is on top of this logistic shortfall.
[The Subic Bulletin] One thing is for sure if that plane has sat at Subic for several years without use, we don't want to be on the first flight!
Whats In A Word
Comment from a reader on "Grizzle About Foreign Investors":
May I suggest that some foreigners are quite adept at "carping." But if you like grizzle better, go for it. Its your ballpark.
May I suggest that some foreigners are quite adept at "carping." But if you like grizzle better, go for it. Its your ballpark.
Friday, October 2, 2009
Government Provided Consumer Protection
Comment from a reader on "No Legal Remedy For SBMA Leaseholders":
One can only wonder how many SB readers fully understand the meaning and implications of the often bandied about legal term, "caveat emptor."
I make the assumption (but could stand corrected) that the Philippine law is based on the precendent set by the case of Laidlaw v. Organ, a decision written in 1817 by Chief Justice John Marshall, which is believed by scholars to have been the first U.S. Supreme Court case which laid down the rule of caveat emptor in U.S. law. In reviewing that decision, one can conclude that in essence the law is saying, "Hey, Boobie, you better check out all the angles and possibilities before you buy into this pig-in-a-poke." Odds are that the SBMA folks see it this way, too.
In the UK, consumer law has moved away from the caveat emptor model, with laws passed that have enhanced consumer rights and allow greater leeway to return goods that do not meet legal standards of acceptance. Many companies operating in the UK, as well as most consumer based economies, will allow customers to return goods within a specified period for a full refund, even if there is no problem with the product.
Perhaps conscientious Philippine lawmakers could benefit from a sneek peek at Brit law, at least on this particular subject.
One can only wonder how many SB readers fully understand the meaning and implications of the often bandied about legal term, "caveat emptor."
I make the assumption (but could stand corrected) that the Philippine law is based on the precendent set by the case of Laidlaw v. Organ, a decision written in 1817 by Chief Justice John Marshall, which is believed by scholars to have been the first U.S. Supreme Court case which laid down the rule of caveat emptor in U.S. law. In reviewing that decision, one can conclude that in essence the law is saying, "Hey, Boobie, you better check out all the angles and possibilities before you buy into this pig-in-a-poke." Odds are that the SBMA folks see it this way, too.
In the UK, consumer law has moved away from the caveat emptor model, with laws passed that have enhanced consumer rights and allow greater leeway to return goods that do not meet legal standards of acceptance. Many companies operating in the UK, as well as most consumer based economies, will allow customers to return goods within a specified period for a full refund, even if there is no problem with the product.
Perhaps conscientious Philippine lawmakers could benefit from a sneek peek at Brit law, at least on this particular subject.
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Subic Freeport, Not The Provincial Lifestyle
Comment on your post "SBMA Not The Only Game In Town":
responding to sbma not the only game in town.. i agree. with seven thousand plus islands. why stay in a open cess pool such as subic. its been three years since my last stay in subic, but i doubt that shit river flows anywhere but right into the harbor, as always. if you are being fleeced, why stay. there are clean beaches just a hour away in san antonio and iba, with beach resorts already there. there are banks and shopping in every city. there are wet markets in every town, for your fish and vegetables. there is a better bar district in manila and angeles city.. might i suggest that you expand your horizons and leave subic.. i am only guessing that people stay there for the hopes of being some what safer ,, then other areas.. but i dont beleive that has been true, since the u.s. was kicked out.. the phils is a large and beautiful country. if one part has gone bad, simply move.
[The Subic Bulletin] Its unfortunate that you have such a shortsighted view of life in Subic. The people who contribute to this website mostly live in Subic and feel that its one of the best places on earth, why do we uncover the shortcomings of the administration and the things that are not right? Because we want to keep it better.
Unfortunately the level of poor education and corruption makes government officials neglect their duties and abandon their constituents, however places like the Subic Freeport were setup to position areas of international standards breaking free of the local problems, Subic Bay Freeport does this but unfortunately the system is still not perfect and that's why we discuss these issues and expose them in The Subic Bulletin.
While we agree the beaches around San Antonio are attractive most of us don't choose to live the provincial lifestyle, most of us have more in our life than a beach, wet market and a bank and whats worse the provincial government is typically running unchecked and you would never get enough people with computers to do what we are doing right here.
We appreciate your opinion but maybe you should come back to Subic again some time with a more open mind. We will still welcome you.
responding to sbma not the only game in town.. i agree. with seven thousand plus islands. why stay in a open cess pool such as subic. its been three years since my last stay in subic, but i doubt that shit river flows anywhere but right into the harbor, as always. if you are being fleeced, why stay. there are clean beaches just a hour away in san antonio and iba, with beach resorts already there. there are banks and shopping in every city. there are wet markets in every town, for your fish and vegetables. there is a better bar district in manila and angeles city.. might i suggest that you expand your horizons and leave subic.. i am only guessing that people stay there for the hopes of being some what safer ,, then other areas.. but i dont beleive that has been true, since the u.s. was kicked out.. the phils is a large and beautiful country. if one part has gone bad, simply move.
[The Subic Bulletin] Its unfortunate that you have such a shortsighted view of life in Subic. The people who contribute to this website mostly live in Subic and feel that its one of the best places on earth, why do we uncover the shortcomings of the administration and the things that are not right? Because we want to keep it better.
Unfortunately the level of poor education and corruption makes government officials neglect their duties and abandon their constituents, however places like the Subic Freeport were setup to position areas of international standards breaking free of the local problems, Subic Bay Freeport does this but unfortunately the system is still not perfect and that's why we discuss these issues and expose them in The Subic Bulletin.
While we agree the beaches around San Antonio are attractive most of us don't choose to live the provincial lifestyle, most of us have more in our life than a beach, wet market and a bank and whats worse the provincial government is typically running unchecked and you would never get enough people with computers to do what we are doing right here.
We appreciate your opinion but maybe you should come back to Subic again some time with a more open mind. We will still welcome you.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
